Static and Dynamic Comparative Advantage: A Multi-Period Analysis with Declining Terms of Trade

THERE IS NO BODY OF ECONOMIC THEORY THAT HAS ACHIEVED GREATER PROFESSIONAL ACCEPTANCE THAN DAVID RICARDO'S THEORY OF COMPARATIVE ADVANTAGE AND THE MODERN EMENDATIONS OF RICARDO'S "LAW." THIS ARTICLE ARGUES THAT IT IS POSSIBLE TO DEMONSTRATE THAT THE BASIC RICARDIAN THEORY OF COMP...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of economic issues 1998-06, Vol.32 (2), p.305-314
Hauptverfasser: Cypher, James M., Dietz, James L.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:THERE IS NO BODY OF ECONOMIC THEORY THAT HAS ACHIEVED GREATER PROFESSIONAL ACCEPTANCE THAN DAVID RICARDO'S THEORY OF COMPARATIVE ADVANTAGE AND THE MODERN EMENDATIONS OF RICARDO'S "LAW." THIS ARTICLE ARGUES THAT IT IS POSSIBLE TO DEMONSTRATE THAT THE BASIC RICARDIAN THEORY OF COMPARATIVE ADVANTAGE IS TOO STATIC A THEORY ON WHICH TO REST A FIRST-BEST ARGUMENT IN FAVOR OF FREE TRADE IN QUITE A NUMBER OF REALISTIC SCENARIES. IT SHOWS THAT THE GENERALIZED ARGUMENT IN FAVOR OF FREE TRADE POLICY DERIVED FROM TRADE THEORY CANNOT BE SUSTAINED ONCE ONE TAKES THE LONG-TERM HISTORICAL TREND OF THE TERMS OF TRADE INTO CONSIDERATION.
ISSN:0021-3624
1946-326X
DOI:10.1080/00213624.1998.11506035