The Depoliticization of Law
Abstract Advocates of the privatization of law often assume that unless law springs from some act of agreement, some express or implicit social contract by which individuals consent to be bound, it is nothing more than force. In this Article, I argue that this is a false dilemma. Although law is rar...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Theoretical Inquiries in Law 2008-07, Vol.9 (2), p.9-552 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Abstract
Advocates of the privatization of law often assume that unless law
springs from some act of agreement, some express or implicit social
contract by which individuals consent to be bound, it is nothing
more than force. In this Article, I argue that this is a false dilemma.
Although law is rarely grounded in consent, this does not imply that
law necessarily gives some individuals command over others. Law
can arise through a process of evolution. When this is the case, those
subject to law are indeed bound, but not by the will of any particular
human beings. Although this depoliticized law is inherently coercive, it
is not inherently a vehicle for domination. This Article argues that such
a system of depoliticized law is consistent with the ideal of the rule
of law, and, in fact, is free market law, when that phrase is properly
understood.
Recommended Citation
Hasnas, John
(2008)
"The Depoliticization of Law,"
Theoretical Inquiries in Law:
Vol. 9
:
No.
2, Article 9.
Available at: http://www.bepress.com/til/default/vol9/iss2/art9 |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1565-3404 1565-1509 1565-3404 |
DOI: | 10.2202/1565-3404.1196 |