Trends in the Prevalence and Ratio of Diagnosed to Undiagnosed Diabetes According to Obesity Levels in the U.S
Trends in the Prevalence and Ratio of Diagnosed to Undiagnosed Diabetes According to Obesity Levels in the U.S. Edward W. Gregg , PHD 1 , Betsy L. Cadwell , MSPH 1 , Yiling J. Cheng , MD, PHD 2 , Catherine C. Cowie , PHD 3 , Desmond E. Williams , MD, PHD 1 , Linda Geiss , MA 1 , Michael M. Engelgau...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Diabetes care 2004-12, Vol.27 (12), p.2806-2812 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Trends in the Prevalence and Ratio of Diagnosed to Undiagnosed Diabetes According to Obesity Levels in the U.S.
Edward W. Gregg , PHD 1 ,
Betsy L. Cadwell , MSPH 1 ,
Yiling J. Cheng , MD, PHD 2 ,
Catherine C. Cowie , PHD 3 ,
Desmond E. Williams , MD, PHD 1 ,
Linda Geiss , MA 1 ,
Michael M. Engelgau , MD 1 and
Frank Vinicor , MD, MPH 1
1 Division of Diabetes Translation, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
2 Division of Information Technology, Northrop Grumman, Atlanta, Georgia
3 National Institute of Diabetes, Digestive, and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
Address correspondence and reprint requests to Edward W. Gregg, PhD, Division of Diabetes Translation, Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention, 4770 Buford Hwy., N.E., Mailstop K-10, Atlanta, GA 30341. E-mail: edg7{at}cdc.gov
Abstract
OBJECTIVE —To examine trends in the prevalence of diagnosed and undiagnosed diabetes and the proportion of total cases previously diagnosed,
according to obesity status in the U.S. over the past 40 years.
RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS —We assembled data from five consecutive cross-sectional national surveys: National Health Examination Survey I (1960–1962),
National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) I (1971–1974), NHANES II (1976–1980), NHANES III (1988–1994), and
NHANES 1999–2000. Diagnosed diabetes was ascertained, and height and weight were measured in adults aged 20–74 years in all
surveys. In NHANES II, NHANES III, and NHANES 1999–2000, a fasting glucose level ≥126 mg/dl was used to identify cases among
individuals not reporting diabetes. Design-based analyses and Bayesian models estimate the probability that prevalence of
diabetes increased within four BMI groups (99.9%) were accompanied by nonsignificant increases in undiagnosed diabetes (2.0–2.4%, 66.6%).
This resulted in an increase in total diabetes (5.3–8.2%, >99.9%) and a modest nonsignificant increase in the proportion of
cases that were diagnosed (62–70%, 62.4%). However, these trends varied considerably by BMI level. In individuals with BMI
≥35 kg/m 2 , diagnosed diabetes increased markedly (from 4.9% in 1960, to 8.6% during 1976–1980, to 15.1% in 1999–2000; probabi |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0149-5992 1935-5548 |
DOI: | 10.2337/diacare.27.12.2806 |