Psychometric testing of the Fall Risks for Older People in the Community screening tool

The Falls Risk for Older People in the Community assessment (FROP-Com) was originally developed using 13 risk factors to identify the fall risks of community-dwelling older people. To suit the practical use in busy clinical settings, a brief version adopting 3 most fall predictive risk factors from...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:PloS one 2020-05, Vol.15 (5), p.e0233045
Hauptverfasser: Ng, Shamay S.M, Liu, Tai-Wa, Kwong, Patrick W.H, Choy, Ho-Man, Fong, Terence Y.K, Lee, Justine Y. C, Tan, Yi-Li, Tong, Gary Y. H, Wong, Crystal C. Y, Lai, Cynthia Y. Y, Tse, Mimi M. Y
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The Falls Risk for Older People in the Community assessment (FROP-Com) was originally developed using 13 risk factors to identify the fall risks of community-dwelling older people. To suit the practical use in busy clinical settings, a brief version adopting 3 most fall predictive risk factors from the original FROP-Com, including the number of falls in the past 12 months, assistance required to perform domestic activities of daily living and observation of balance, was developed for screening purpose (FROP-Com screen). The objectives of this study were to investigate the inter-rater and test-retest reliability, concurrent and convergent validity, and minimum detectable change of the FROP-Com screen in community-dwelling people with stroke. Community-dwelling people with stroke (n = 48) were recruited from a local self-help group, and community-dwelling older people (n = 40) were recruited as control subjects. The FROP-Com screen exhibited moderate inter-rater (Intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC].sub.2,1 = 0.79, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.65-0.87) and test-retest reliability (ICC.sub.3,1 = 0.70, 95% CI: 0.46-0.83) and weak associations with two balance measures, the Berg Balance Scale (BBS) (rho = -0.38, p = 0.008) and the Timed "Up & Go" (TUG) test (rho = 0.35, p = 0.016). The screen also exhibited a moderate association with the Chinese version of the Activities-specific Balance Confidence Scale (ABC-C) (ABC-C; rho = -0.65, p
ISSN:1932-6203
1932-6203
DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0233045