Universite de Montreal Objective and Structured Checklist for Assessment of Audiovisual Recordings of Surgeries/techniques
Background: Use of videos of surgical and medical techniques for educational purposes has grown over the last years. To our knowledge, there is no validated tool to specifically assess the quality of these types of videos. Our goal was to create an evaluation tool and study its intrarater and interr...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Canadian journal of surgery 2021-04, Vol.64 (2), p.E232 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background: Use of videos of surgical and medical techniques for educational purposes has grown over the last years. To our knowledge, there is no validated tool to specifically assess the quality of these types of videos. Our goal was to create an evaluation tool and study its intrarater and interrater reliability and its acceptability. We named our tool UM-OSCAARS (Universite de Montreal Objective and Structured Checklist for Assessment of Audiovisual Recordings of Surgeries/techniques). Methods: UM-OSCAARS is a grid containing 10 criteria, each of which is graded on an ordinal Likert-type scale of 1 to 5 points. We tested the grid with the help of 4 voluntary otolaryngology - head and neck surgery specialists who individually viewed 10 preselected videos. The evaluators graded each criterion for each video. To evaluate intrarater reliability, the evaluation took place in 2 different phases separated by 4 weeks. Interrater reliability was assessed by comparing the 4 top-ranked videos of each evaluator. Results: There was almost-perfect agreement among the evaluators regarding the 4 videos that received the highest scores from the evaluators, demonstrating that the tool has excellent interrater reliability. There was excellent test-retest correlation, demonstrating the tool's intrarater reliability. Conclusion: The UM-OSCAARS has proven to be reliable and acceptable to use, but its validity needs to be more thoroughly assessed. We hope this tool will lead to an improvement in the quality of technical videos used for educational purposes. Contexte : Au fil des ans, l'utilisation de videos pour l'enseignement de techniques chirurgicales et medicales s'est repandue. A notre connaissance, il n'existe aucun outil pour evaluer specifiquement la qualite de ces types de videos. Notre objectif etait de creer un outil d'evaluation et d'analyser sa fiabilite interevaluateurs et son acceptabi lite. Notre outil a pour nom UM-OSCAARS (Universite de Montreal Objective and Structured Checklist for Assessment of Audiovisual Recordings of Surgeries/Techniques). Methodes : L'outil UM-OSCAARS est une grille qui contient 10 criteres; chacun est note sur une echelle de type Likert de 1 a 5 points. Nous avons teste la grille avec l'aide de 4 volontaires, specialistes en otorhinolaryngologie/chirurgie de la tete et du cou, qui ont visionne 10 videos preselectionnees. Les evaluateurs ont note chacun des criteres pour chaque video. Afin de verifier la fiabilite interevaluateurs, l |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0008-428X 1488-2310 |
DOI: | 10.1503/cjs.018418 |