Perceived needs of disease vector control programs: A review and synthesis of

Systems for disease vector control should be effective, efficient, and flexible to be able to tackle contemporary challenges and threats in the control and elimination of vector-borne diseases. As a priority activity towards the strengthening of vector control systems, it has been advocated that cou...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:PLoS neglected tropical diseases 2024-04, Vol.18 (4)
Hauptverfasser: Yadav, Rajpal S, Kumar, Ashwani, Uranw, Surendra, Shriram, Ananganallur N, Nagpal, Bhupender N, Sinha, Akhouri T. S, Kumari, Roop, Gupta, Hardev Prasad, Perera, Devika, Saleem, Sana, Sedaghat, Mohammad Mehdi, Esmail, Mohammed A, Sultana, Sabera, Bashar, Kabirul, Bhatt, Rajendra M, Velayudhan, Raman, Chowdhury, Rajib, Sabesan, Shanmugavelu, Kusumawathie, Pahalagedera H. D, Carrington, Lauren B, Najmee, Aishath Shaheen, Enayati, Ahmadali, Hassan, Hameeda Mohammed, Konuganti, Hari Kishan Raju, Al-Eryani, Samira M, van den Berg, Henk
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Systems for disease vector control should be effective, efficient, and flexible to be able to tackle contemporary challenges and threats in the control and elimination of vector-borne diseases. As a priority activity towards the strengthening of vector control systems, it has been advocated that countries conduct a vector-control needs assessment. A review was carried out of the perceived needs for disease vector control programs among eleven countries and subnational states in South Asia and the Middle East. In each country or state, independent teams conducted vector control needs assessment with engagement of stakeholders. Important weaknesses were described for malaria, dengue and leishmaniases regarding vector surveillance, insecticide susceptibility testing, monitoring and evaluation of operations, entomological capacity and laboratory infrastructure. In addition, community mobilization and intersectoral collaboration showed important gaps. Countries and states expressed concern about insecticide resistance that could reduce the continued effectiveness of interventions, which demands improved monitoring. Moreover, attainment of disease elimination necessitates enhanced vector surveillance. Vector control needs assessment provided a useful planning tool for systematic strengthening of vector control systems. A limitation in conducting the vector control needs assessment was that it is time- and resource-intensive. To increase the feasibility and utility of national assessments, an abridged version of the guidance should focus on operationally relevant topics of the assessment. Similar reviews are needed in other regions with different contextual conditions.
ISSN:1935-2727