Comparative study of the effect of N95 facemask and Powered Air-purifying Respirator

N95 masks filter 95% of the small particles and respiratory droplets (>0.3 [micro], m diameter). Therefore, they are widely used both by general public and health workers during pandemic. When physical activity or exercise is performed wearing N95 mask, it induces hypercapnic environment. The heat burden is also increased leading to discomfort and reduced compliance. This study was done to compare physiological effects and subjective perceptions while wearing N95 mask and powered air-purifying respirator (PAPR) (2 fans, N95 filter) during incremental exercise. ECG, respiratory movement, Sp[O.sub.2], temperature inside the mask were recorded and perception of discomfort was also assessed. Heart rate variability (HRV) values during baseline were within normal limits in both the mask conditions signifying that cardiac autonomic tone is comparable. During incremental exercise, fall in Sp[O.sub.2] was significantly lesser in PAPR as compared to N95 mask at 60-70% and 70-80% of maximum achievable heart rate. The temperatures inside both the mask conditions were significantly higher than ambient temperature. The scores of humid, hot, breath resistance and fatigue were significantly lower in PAPR than N95 mask. In conditions where prolonged use of mask is required with strenuous physical exertion or exercise, PAPR could be preferred over N95 mask. Key words: Cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET), COVID-19, HRV, N95 mask, PAPR