On-farm welfare assessment in dairy cattle and buffaloes: evaluation of some animal-based parameters
The aim of this study was to evaluate the repeatability of some animal related variables, which could be used in protocols developed for assessing animal welfare at farm level. Recordings were performed in seven dairy farms (four for cattle and three for buffaloes). The animals were observed on thre...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Italian journal of animal science 2005, Vol.4 (3), p.223-231 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 231 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 223 |
container_title | Italian journal of animal science |
container_volume | 4 |
creator | Napolitano, F. (Basilicata Univ., Potenza (Italy). Dipartimento di Scienze delle Produzioni Animali) Grasso, F. (Naples Univ. (Italy). Dipartimento di Scienze Zootecniche e Ispezione Alimenti) Bordi, A. (Naples Univ. (Italy). Dipartimento di Scienze Zootecniche e Ispezione Alimenti) Tripaldi, C. (Consiglio per la Ricerca e la Sperimentazione in Agricoltura (CRA) - Istituto Sperimentale per la Zootecnia, Monterotondo, Rome (Italy)) Saltalamacchia, F. (Consiglio per la Ricerca e la Sperimentazione in Agricoltura (CRA) - Istituto Sperimentale per la Zootecnia, Monterotondo, Rome (Italy)) Pacelli, C. (Basilicata Univ., Potenza (Italy). Dipartimento di Scienze delle Produzioni Animali) Rosa, G. De (Naples Univ. (Italy). Dipartimento di Scienze Zootecniche e Ispezione Alimenti) |
description | The aim of this study was to evaluate the repeatability of some animal related variables, which could be used in protocols developed for assessing animal welfare at farm level. Recordings were performed in seven dairy farms (four for cattle and three for buffaloes). The animals were observed on three occasions at three-week intervals. The variables collected for each animal were the following: behaviour during milking (stepping and kicking), avoidance distance, lameness and cleanliness. For each farm and each variable repeatability was computed using the Kendall coefficient of concordance (W). In buffalo farms avoidance distance may be considered highly reliable (W > 0.64), whereas in dairy cattle its reliability ranged from medium (W = 0.43 to 0.59) to high (W = 0.64). Behavioural recordings at milking showed that the reliability of stepping was either medium or high for both buffaloes and cattle (W = 0.51 to 0.66 and W = 0.52 to 0.76 for buffaloes and cattle, respectively). Conversely, kicking was less reliable. In cattle farms the reliability for cleanliness ranged from medium (W = 0.51) to high (W = 0.62 to 0.71), whereas, it was not reliable in the sole buffalo farm where this variable was monitored. In cattle farms, the concordance for lameness score was high in two farms (W = 0.62 and 0.66) and moderate in one farm (W = 0.43), whereas no animals displayed lameness in the fourth farm. In all buffalo farms no animals showed lameness. For each species, the Kruskal-Wallis analysis of variance with one factor (farm) was performed to evaluate the effect of farm on recorded variables. For cattle, avoidance distance (P |
doi_str_mv | 10.4081/ijas.2005.223 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>fao_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_fao_agris_IT2006600476</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_581400a74cc74fbca355093a9f2c3052</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>IT2006600476</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c374t-2a076c8890c5f5d9672e74c8d640399098fe1d37f1af05680d7e98275aa14c343</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM1rGzEQxZeSQhO3xx4L-gfWHX2tpNyKSRODIZcUehNjfQSZ3VWQNjX-7yvHobeeZpj33o_hdd1XCmsBmn5PB6xrBiDXjPEP3TXVTPcg6e-rtksjegFKfepuaj0ADMAZv-7849xHLBM5hrHNQLDWUOsU5oWkmXhM5UQcLsvYpNmT_WuMOOZQb0n4g-MrLinPJEdS83R2pAnHfo81ePKCBaewhFI_dx9bqIYv73PV_fp597R56HeP99vNj13vuBJLzxDU4LQ24GSU3gyKBSWc9oMAbgwYHQP1XEWKEeSgwatgNFMSkQrHBV912wvXZzzYl9KeKSebMdm3Qy7PFsuS3Bis1FQAYMM7JeLeIZcSDEcTmeMgWWP1F5YrudYS4j8eBXuu257rtue6bau7-fXFn-aYy4THXEZvFzyNucSCs0vV8v9Fv12iEbPF59Kc26emDgOAUAP_CzXej00</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>On-farm welfare assessment in dairy cattle and buffaloes: evaluation of some animal-based parameters</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Napolitano, F. (Basilicata Univ., Potenza (Italy). Dipartimento di Scienze delle Produzioni Animali) ; Grasso, F. (Naples Univ. (Italy). Dipartimento di Scienze Zootecniche e Ispezione Alimenti) ; Bordi, A. (Naples Univ. (Italy). Dipartimento di Scienze Zootecniche e Ispezione Alimenti) ; Tripaldi, C. (Consiglio per la Ricerca e la Sperimentazione in Agricoltura (CRA) - Istituto Sperimentale per la Zootecnia, Monterotondo, Rome (Italy)) ; Saltalamacchia, F. (Consiglio per la Ricerca e la Sperimentazione in Agricoltura (CRA) - Istituto Sperimentale per la Zootecnia, Monterotondo, Rome (Italy)) ; Pacelli, C. (Basilicata Univ., Potenza (Italy). Dipartimento di Scienze delle Produzioni Animali) ; Rosa, G. De (Naples Univ. (Italy). Dipartimento di Scienze Zootecniche e Ispezione Alimenti)</creator><creatorcontrib>Napolitano, F. (Basilicata Univ., Potenza (Italy). Dipartimento di Scienze delle Produzioni Animali) ; Grasso, F. (Naples Univ. (Italy). Dipartimento di Scienze Zootecniche e Ispezione Alimenti) ; Bordi, A. (Naples Univ. (Italy). Dipartimento di Scienze Zootecniche e Ispezione Alimenti) ; Tripaldi, C. (Consiglio per la Ricerca e la Sperimentazione in Agricoltura (CRA) - Istituto Sperimentale per la Zootecnia, Monterotondo, Rome (Italy)) ; Saltalamacchia, F. (Consiglio per la Ricerca e la Sperimentazione in Agricoltura (CRA) - Istituto Sperimentale per la Zootecnia, Monterotondo, Rome (Italy)) ; Pacelli, C. (Basilicata Univ., Potenza (Italy). Dipartimento di Scienze delle Produzioni Animali) ; Rosa, G. De (Naples Univ. (Italy). Dipartimento di Scienze Zootecniche e Ispezione Alimenti)</creatorcontrib><description><![CDATA[The aim of this study was to evaluate the repeatability of some animal related variables, which could be used in protocols developed for assessing animal welfare at farm level. Recordings were performed in seven dairy farms (four for cattle and three for buffaloes). The animals were observed on three occasions at three-week intervals. The variables collected for each animal were the following: behaviour during milking (stepping and kicking), avoidance distance, lameness and cleanliness. For each farm and each variable repeatability was computed using the Kendall coefficient of concordance (W). In buffalo farms avoidance distance may be considered highly reliable (W > 0.64), whereas in dairy cattle its reliability ranged from medium (W = 0.43 to 0.59) to high (W = 0.64). Behavioural recordings at milking showed that the reliability of stepping was either medium or high for both buffaloes and cattle (W = 0.51 to 0.66 and W = 0.52 to 0.76 for buffaloes and cattle, respectively). Conversely, kicking was less reliable. In cattle farms the reliability for cleanliness ranged from medium (W = 0.51) to high (W = 0.62 to 0.71), whereas, it was not reliable in the sole buffalo farm where this variable was monitored. In cattle farms, the concordance for lameness score was high in two farms (W = 0.62 and 0.66) and moderate in one farm (W = 0.43), whereas no animals displayed lameness in the fourth farm. In all buffalo farms no animals showed lameness. For each species, the Kruskal-Wallis analysis of variance with one factor (farm) was performed to evaluate the effect of farm on recorded variables. For cattle, avoidance distance (P<0.001), stepping (P<0.001), cleanliness (P<0.001) and lameness (P<0.01) were affected by farm, whereas kicking was not significantly different between farms. In buffaloes a significant effect of farm was observed only for avoidance distance (P<0.01). The Mann-Whitney U test performed on data obtained from the farm where both species were present showed that avoidance distance was lower in buffaloes than cattle (P<0.001). This variable is reliable, feasible and able to discriminate among farms. Lameness and cleanliness scores were able to discriminate only cattle farms, whereas these two parameters, albeit feasible, seem to have low significance for buffaloes. Although stepping during milking was reliable and different among cattle farms, its use in on-farm assessment may be difficult because it is more time consuming, thus less feasible.]]></description><identifier>ISSN: 1594-4077</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1828-051X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1828-051X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4081/ijas.2005.223</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Taylor & Francis</publisher><subject>allevamento degli animali ; animal health ; animal husbandry ; animal welfare ; Behaviour ; Benessere ; benessere dell´animale ; Bien-être animal ; Bienestar animal ; Bufala ; bufali domestici ; Buffalo ; buffalo milk ; Buffle domestique ; Búfalo doméstico ; Comportamento ; Comportamiento ; Comportement ; conteggio delle cellule somatiche ; Conteo de células somáticas ; cow milk ; Dairy cattle ; Dairy cattle, Buffalo, On-farm assessment, Behaviour, Reliability ; dairy cows ; disfunzioni della locomozione ; domestic buffaloes ; Ganadería ; Higiene veterinaria ; Hygiène vétérinaire ; igiene veterinaria ; immune response ; Lait de bufflesse ; Lait de vache ; latte di bufala ; latte di vacca ; Leche de búfala ; Leche de vaca ; mathematical models ; metodi statistici ; milk yield ; milking ; modelli matematici ; Modelos matemáticos ; Modèle mathématique ; movement disorders ; mungitura ; Méthode statistique ; Métodos estadísticos ; Numération cellulaire somatique ; On-farm assessment ; Ordeño ; Reliability ; Rendement laitier ; rendimento in latte ; Rendimiento lechero ; Respuesta inmunológica ; Ripetibilità ; risposta immunitaria ; Réponse immunitaire ; salute degli animali ; Sanidad animal ; Santé animale ; somatic cell count ; statistical methods ; Traite ; Trastornos de la locomoción ; Trouble locomoteur ; Vacas lecheras ; Vacca da latte ; vacche lattifere ; Vache laitière ; veterinary hygiene ; Élevage</subject><ispartof>Italian journal of animal science, 2005, Vol.4 (3), p.223-231</ispartof><rights>2005 Taylor & Francis Group LLC 2005</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c374t-2a076c8890c5f5d9672e74c8d640399098fe1d37f1af05680d7e98275aa14c343</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c374t-2a076c8890c5f5d9672e74c8d640399098fe1d37f1af05680d7e98275aa14c343</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,860,2096,4010,27900,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Napolitano, F. (Basilicata Univ., Potenza (Italy). Dipartimento di Scienze delle Produzioni Animali)</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grasso, F. (Naples Univ. (Italy). Dipartimento di Scienze Zootecniche e Ispezione Alimenti)</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bordi, A. (Naples Univ. (Italy). Dipartimento di Scienze Zootecniche e Ispezione Alimenti)</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tripaldi, C. (Consiglio per la Ricerca e la Sperimentazione in Agricoltura (CRA) - Istituto Sperimentale per la Zootecnia, Monterotondo, Rome (Italy))</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saltalamacchia, F. (Consiglio per la Ricerca e la Sperimentazione in Agricoltura (CRA) - Istituto Sperimentale per la Zootecnia, Monterotondo, Rome (Italy))</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pacelli, C. (Basilicata Univ., Potenza (Italy). Dipartimento di Scienze delle Produzioni Animali)</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosa, G. De (Naples Univ. (Italy). Dipartimento di Scienze Zootecniche e Ispezione Alimenti)</creatorcontrib><title>On-farm welfare assessment in dairy cattle and buffaloes: evaluation of some animal-based parameters</title><title>Italian journal of animal science</title><description><![CDATA[The aim of this study was to evaluate the repeatability of some animal related variables, which could be used in protocols developed for assessing animal welfare at farm level. Recordings were performed in seven dairy farms (four for cattle and three for buffaloes). The animals were observed on three occasions at three-week intervals. The variables collected for each animal were the following: behaviour during milking (stepping and kicking), avoidance distance, lameness and cleanliness. For each farm and each variable repeatability was computed using the Kendall coefficient of concordance (W). In buffalo farms avoidance distance may be considered highly reliable (W > 0.64), whereas in dairy cattle its reliability ranged from medium (W = 0.43 to 0.59) to high (W = 0.64). Behavioural recordings at milking showed that the reliability of stepping was either medium or high for both buffaloes and cattle (W = 0.51 to 0.66 and W = 0.52 to 0.76 for buffaloes and cattle, respectively). Conversely, kicking was less reliable. In cattle farms the reliability for cleanliness ranged from medium (W = 0.51) to high (W = 0.62 to 0.71), whereas, it was not reliable in the sole buffalo farm where this variable was monitored. In cattle farms, the concordance for lameness score was high in two farms (W = 0.62 and 0.66) and moderate in one farm (W = 0.43), whereas no animals displayed lameness in the fourth farm. In all buffalo farms no animals showed lameness. For each species, the Kruskal-Wallis analysis of variance with one factor (farm) was performed to evaluate the effect of farm on recorded variables. For cattle, avoidance distance (P<0.001), stepping (P<0.001), cleanliness (P<0.001) and lameness (P<0.01) were affected by farm, whereas kicking was not significantly different between farms. In buffaloes a significant effect of farm was observed only for avoidance distance (P<0.01). The Mann-Whitney U test performed on data obtained from the farm where both species were present showed that avoidance distance was lower in buffaloes than cattle (P<0.001). This variable is reliable, feasible and able to discriminate among farms. Lameness and cleanliness scores were able to discriminate only cattle farms, whereas these two parameters, albeit feasible, seem to have low significance for buffaloes. Although stepping during milking was reliable and different among cattle farms, its use in on-farm assessment may be difficult because it is more time consuming, thus less feasible.]]></description><subject>allevamento degli animali</subject><subject>animal health</subject><subject>animal husbandry</subject><subject>animal welfare</subject><subject>Behaviour</subject><subject>Benessere</subject><subject>benessere dell´animale</subject><subject>Bien-être animal</subject><subject>Bienestar animal</subject><subject>Bufala</subject><subject>bufali domestici</subject><subject>Buffalo</subject><subject>buffalo milk</subject><subject>Buffle domestique</subject><subject>Búfalo doméstico</subject><subject>Comportamento</subject><subject>Comportamiento</subject><subject>Comportement</subject><subject>conteggio delle cellule somatiche</subject><subject>Conteo de células somáticas</subject><subject>cow milk</subject><subject>Dairy cattle</subject><subject>Dairy cattle, Buffalo, On-farm assessment, Behaviour, Reliability</subject><subject>dairy cows</subject><subject>disfunzioni della locomozione</subject><subject>domestic buffaloes</subject><subject>Ganadería</subject><subject>Higiene veterinaria</subject><subject>Hygiène vétérinaire</subject><subject>igiene veterinaria</subject><subject>immune response</subject><subject>Lait de bufflesse</subject><subject>Lait de vache</subject><subject>latte di bufala</subject><subject>latte di vacca</subject><subject>Leche de búfala</subject><subject>Leche de vaca</subject><subject>mathematical models</subject><subject>metodi statistici</subject><subject>milk yield</subject><subject>milking</subject><subject>modelli matematici</subject><subject>Modelos matemáticos</subject><subject>Modèle mathématique</subject><subject>movement disorders</subject><subject>mungitura</subject><subject>Méthode statistique</subject><subject>Métodos estadísticos</subject><subject>Numération cellulaire somatique</subject><subject>On-farm assessment</subject><subject>Ordeño</subject><subject>Reliability</subject><subject>Rendement laitier</subject><subject>rendimento in latte</subject><subject>Rendimiento lechero</subject><subject>Respuesta inmunológica</subject><subject>Ripetibilità</subject><subject>risposta immunitaria</subject><subject>Réponse immunitaire</subject><subject>salute degli animali</subject><subject>Sanidad animal</subject><subject>Santé animale</subject><subject>somatic cell count</subject><subject>statistical methods</subject><subject>Traite</subject><subject>Trastornos de la locomoción</subject><subject>Trouble locomoteur</subject><subject>Vacas lecheras</subject><subject>Vacca da latte</subject><subject>vacche lattifere</subject><subject>Vache laitière</subject><subject>veterinary hygiene</subject><subject>Élevage</subject><issn>1594-4077</issn><issn>1828-051X</issn><issn>1828-051X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kM1rGzEQxZeSQhO3xx4L-gfWHX2tpNyKSRODIZcUehNjfQSZ3VWQNjX-7yvHobeeZpj33o_hdd1XCmsBmn5PB6xrBiDXjPEP3TXVTPcg6e-rtksjegFKfepuaj0ADMAZv-7849xHLBM5hrHNQLDWUOsU5oWkmXhM5UQcLsvYpNmT_WuMOOZQb0n4g-MrLinPJEdS83R2pAnHfo81ePKCBaewhFI_dx9bqIYv73PV_fp597R56HeP99vNj13vuBJLzxDU4LQ24GSU3gyKBSWc9oMAbgwYHQP1XEWKEeSgwatgNFMSkQrHBV912wvXZzzYl9KeKSebMdm3Qy7PFsuS3Bis1FQAYMM7JeLeIZcSDEcTmeMgWWP1F5YrudYS4j8eBXuu257rtue6bau7-fXFn-aYy4THXEZvFzyNucSCs0vV8v9Fv12iEbPF59Kc26emDgOAUAP_CzXej00</recordid><startdate>2005</startdate><enddate>2005</enddate><creator>Napolitano, F. (Basilicata Univ., Potenza (Italy). Dipartimento di Scienze delle Produzioni Animali)</creator><creator>Grasso, F. (Naples Univ. (Italy). Dipartimento di Scienze Zootecniche e Ispezione Alimenti)</creator><creator>Bordi, A. (Naples Univ. (Italy). Dipartimento di Scienze Zootecniche e Ispezione Alimenti)</creator><creator>Tripaldi, C. (Consiglio per la Ricerca e la Sperimentazione in Agricoltura (CRA) - Istituto Sperimentale per la Zootecnia, Monterotondo, Rome (Italy))</creator><creator>Saltalamacchia, F. (Consiglio per la Ricerca e la Sperimentazione in Agricoltura (CRA) - Istituto Sperimentale per la Zootecnia, Monterotondo, Rome (Italy))</creator><creator>Pacelli, C. (Basilicata Univ., Potenza (Italy). Dipartimento di Scienze delle Produzioni Animali)</creator><creator>Rosa, G. De (Naples Univ. (Italy). Dipartimento di Scienze Zootecniche e Ispezione Alimenti)</creator><general>Taylor & Francis</general><general>Taylor & Francis Group</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2005</creationdate><title>On-farm welfare assessment in dairy cattle and buffaloes: evaluation of some animal-based parameters</title><author>Napolitano, F. (Basilicata Univ., Potenza (Italy). Dipartimento di Scienze delle Produzioni Animali) ; Grasso, F. (Naples Univ. (Italy). Dipartimento di Scienze Zootecniche e Ispezione Alimenti) ; Bordi, A. (Naples Univ. (Italy). Dipartimento di Scienze Zootecniche e Ispezione Alimenti) ; Tripaldi, C. (Consiglio per la Ricerca e la Sperimentazione in Agricoltura (CRA) - Istituto Sperimentale per la Zootecnia, Monterotondo, Rome (Italy)) ; Saltalamacchia, F. (Consiglio per la Ricerca e la Sperimentazione in Agricoltura (CRA) - Istituto Sperimentale per la Zootecnia, Monterotondo, Rome (Italy)) ; Pacelli, C. (Basilicata Univ., Potenza (Italy). Dipartimento di Scienze delle Produzioni Animali) ; Rosa, G. De (Naples Univ. (Italy). Dipartimento di Scienze Zootecniche e Ispezione Alimenti)</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c374t-2a076c8890c5f5d9672e74c8d640399098fe1d37f1af05680d7e98275aa14c343</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>allevamento degli animali</topic><topic>animal health</topic><topic>animal husbandry</topic><topic>animal welfare</topic><topic>Behaviour</topic><topic>Benessere</topic><topic>benessere dell´animale</topic><topic>Bien-être animal</topic><topic>Bienestar animal</topic><topic>Bufala</topic><topic>bufali domestici</topic><topic>Buffalo</topic><topic>buffalo milk</topic><topic>Buffle domestique</topic><topic>Búfalo doméstico</topic><topic>Comportamento</topic><topic>Comportamiento</topic><topic>Comportement</topic><topic>conteggio delle cellule somatiche</topic><topic>Conteo de células somáticas</topic><topic>cow milk</topic><topic>Dairy cattle</topic><topic>Dairy cattle, Buffalo, On-farm assessment, Behaviour, Reliability</topic><topic>dairy cows</topic><topic>disfunzioni della locomozione</topic><topic>domestic buffaloes</topic><topic>Ganadería</topic><topic>Higiene veterinaria</topic><topic>Hygiène vétérinaire</topic><topic>igiene veterinaria</topic><topic>immune response</topic><topic>Lait de bufflesse</topic><topic>Lait de vache</topic><topic>latte di bufala</topic><topic>latte di vacca</topic><topic>Leche de búfala</topic><topic>Leche de vaca</topic><topic>mathematical models</topic><topic>metodi statistici</topic><topic>milk yield</topic><topic>milking</topic><topic>modelli matematici</topic><topic>Modelos matemáticos</topic><topic>Modèle mathématique</topic><topic>movement disorders</topic><topic>mungitura</topic><topic>Méthode statistique</topic><topic>Métodos estadísticos</topic><topic>Numération cellulaire somatique</topic><topic>On-farm assessment</topic><topic>Ordeño</topic><topic>Reliability</topic><topic>Rendement laitier</topic><topic>rendimento in latte</topic><topic>Rendimiento lechero</topic><topic>Respuesta inmunológica</topic><topic>Ripetibilità</topic><topic>risposta immunitaria</topic><topic>Réponse immunitaire</topic><topic>salute degli animali</topic><topic>Sanidad animal</topic><topic>Santé animale</topic><topic>somatic cell count</topic><topic>statistical methods</topic><topic>Traite</topic><topic>Trastornos de la locomoción</topic><topic>Trouble locomoteur</topic><topic>Vacas lecheras</topic><topic>Vacca da latte</topic><topic>vacche lattifere</topic><topic>Vache laitière</topic><topic>veterinary hygiene</topic><topic>Élevage</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Napolitano, F. (Basilicata Univ., Potenza (Italy). Dipartimento di Scienze delle Produzioni Animali)</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grasso, F. (Naples Univ. (Italy). Dipartimento di Scienze Zootecniche e Ispezione Alimenti)</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bordi, A. (Naples Univ. (Italy). Dipartimento di Scienze Zootecniche e Ispezione Alimenti)</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tripaldi, C. (Consiglio per la Ricerca e la Sperimentazione in Agricoltura (CRA) - Istituto Sperimentale per la Zootecnia, Monterotondo, Rome (Italy))</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saltalamacchia, F. (Consiglio per la Ricerca e la Sperimentazione in Agricoltura (CRA) - Istituto Sperimentale per la Zootecnia, Monterotondo, Rome (Italy))</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pacelli, C. (Basilicata Univ., Potenza (Italy). Dipartimento di Scienze delle Produzioni Animali)</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosa, G. De (Naples Univ. (Italy). Dipartimento di Scienze Zootecniche e Ispezione Alimenti)</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Italian journal of animal science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Napolitano, F. (Basilicata Univ., Potenza (Italy). Dipartimento di Scienze delle Produzioni Animali)</au><au>Grasso, F. (Naples Univ. (Italy). Dipartimento di Scienze Zootecniche e Ispezione Alimenti)</au><au>Bordi, A. (Naples Univ. (Italy). Dipartimento di Scienze Zootecniche e Ispezione Alimenti)</au><au>Tripaldi, C. (Consiglio per la Ricerca e la Sperimentazione in Agricoltura (CRA) - Istituto Sperimentale per la Zootecnia, Monterotondo, Rome (Italy))</au><au>Saltalamacchia, F. (Consiglio per la Ricerca e la Sperimentazione in Agricoltura (CRA) - Istituto Sperimentale per la Zootecnia, Monterotondo, Rome (Italy))</au><au>Pacelli, C. (Basilicata Univ., Potenza (Italy). Dipartimento di Scienze delle Produzioni Animali)</au><au>Rosa, G. De (Naples Univ. (Italy). Dipartimento di Scienze Zootecniche e Ispezione Alimenti)</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>On-farm welfare assessment in dairy cattle and buffaloes: evaluation of some animal-based parameters</atitle><jtitle>Italian journal of animal science</jtitle><date>2005</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>4</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>223</spage><epage>231</epage><pages>223-231</pages><issn>1594-4077</issn><issn>1828-051X</issn><eissn>1828-051X</eissn><abstract><![CDATA[The aim of this study was to evaluate the repeatability of some animal related variables, which could be used in protocols developed for assessing animal welfare at farm level. Recordings were performed in seven dairy farms (four for cattle and three for buffaloes). The animals were observed on three occasions at three-week intervals. The variables collected for each animal were the following: behaviour during milking (stepping and kicking), avoidance distance, lameness and cleanliness. For each farm and each variable repeatability was computed using the Kendall coefficient of concordance (W). In buffalo farms avoidance distance may be considered highly reliable (W > 0.64), whereas in dairy cattle its reliability ranged from medium (W = 0.43 to 0.59) to high (W = 0.64). Behavioural recordings at milking showed that the reliability of stepping was either medium or high for both buffaloes and cattle (W = 0.51 to 0.66 and W = 0.52 to 0.76 for buffaloes and cattle, respectively). Conversely, kicking was less reliable. In cattle farms the reliability for cleanliness ranged from medium (W = 0.51) to high (W = 0.62 to 0.71), whereas, it was not reliable in the sole buffalo farm where this variable was monitored. In cattle farms, the concordance for lameness score was high in two farms (W = 0.62 and 0.66) and moderate in one farm (W = 0.43), whereas no animals displayed lameness in the fourth farm. In all buffalo farms no animals showed lameness. For each species, the Kruskal-Wallis analysis of variance with one factor (farm) was performed to evaluate the effect of farm on recorded variables. For cattle, avoidance distance (P<0.001), stepping (P<0.001), cleanliness (P<0.001) and lameness (P<0.01) were affected by farm, whereas kicking was not significantly different between farms. In buffaloes a significant effect of farm was observed only for avoidance distance (P<0.01). The Mann-Whitney U test performed on data obtained from the farm where both species were present showed that avoidance distance was lower in buffaloes than cattle (P<0.001). This variable is reliable, feasible and able to discriminate among farms. Lameness and cleanliness scores were able to discriminate only cattle farms, whereas these two parameters, albeit feasible, seem to have low significance for buffaloes. Although stepping during milking was reliable and different among cattle farms, its use in on-farm assessment may be difficult because it is more time consuming, thus less feasible.]]></abstract><pub>Taylor & Francis</pub><doi>10.4081/ijas.2005.223</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1594-4077 |
ispartof | Italian journal of animal science, 2005, Vol.4 (3), p.223-231 |
issn | 1594-4077 1828-051X 1828-051X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_fao_agris_IT2006600476 |
source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals |
subjects | allevamento degli animali animal health animal husbandry animal welfare Behaviour Benessere benessere dell´animale Bien-être animal Bienestar animal Bufala bufali domestici Buffalo buffalo milk Buffle domestique Búfalo doméstico Comportamento Comportamiento Comportement conteggio delle cellule somatiche Conteo de células somáticas cow milk Dairy cattle Dairy cattle, Buffalo, On-farm assessment, Behaviour, Reliability dairy cows disfunzioni della locomozione domestic buffaloes Ganadería Higiene veterinaria Hygiène vétérinaire igiene veterinaria immune response Lait de bufflesse Lait de vache latte di bufala latte di vacca Leche de búfala Leche de vaca mathematical models metodi statistici milk yield milking modelli matematici Modelos matemáticos Modèle mathématique movement disorders mungitura Méthode statistique Métodos estadísticos Numération cellulaire somatique On-farm assessment Ordeño Reliability Rendement laitier rendimento in latte Rendimiento lechero Respuesta inmunológica Ripetibilità risposta immunitaria Réponse immunitaire salute degli animali Sanidad animal Santé animale somatic cell count statistical methods Traite Trastornos de la locomoción Trouble locomoteur Vacas lecheras Vacca da latte vacche lattifere Vache laitière veterinary hygiene Élevage |
title | On-farm welfare assessment in dairy cattle and buffaloes: evaluation of some animal-based parameters |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T14%3A09%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-fao_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=On-farm%20welfare%20assessment%20in%20dairy%20cattle%20and%20buffaloes:%20evaluation%20of%20some%20animal-based%20parameters&rft.jtitle=Italian%20journal%20of%20animal%20science&rft.au=Napolitano,%20F.%20(Basilicata%20Univ.,%20Potenza%20(Italy).%20Dipartimento%20di%20Scienze%20delle%20Produzioni%20Animali)&rft.date=2005&rft.volume=4&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=223&rft.epage=231&rft.pages=223-231&rft.issn=1594-4077&rft.eissn=1828-051X&rft_id=info:doi/10.4081/ijas.2005.223&rft_dat=%3Cfao_cross%3EIT2006600476%3C/fao_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_581400a74cc74fbca355093a9f2c3052&rfr_iscdi=true |