On-farm welfare assessment in dairy cattle and buffaloes: evaluation of some animal-based parameters

The aim of this study was to evaluate the repeatability of some animal related variables, which could be used in protocols developed for assessing animal welfare at farm level. Recordings were performed in seven dairy farms (four for cattle and three for buffaloes). The animals were observed on thre...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Italian journal of animal science 2005, Vol.4 (3), p.223-231
Hauptverfasser: Napolitano, F. (Basilicata Univ., Potenza (Italy). Dipartimento di Scienze delle Produzioni Animali), Grasso, F. (Naples Univ. (Italy). Dipartimento di Scienze Zootecniche e Ispezione Alimenti), Bordi, A. (Naples Univ. (Italy). Dipartimento di Scienze Zootecniche e Ispezione Alimenti), Tripaldi, C. (Consiglio per la Ricerca e la Sperimentazione in Agricoltura (CRA) - Istituto Sperimentale per la Zootecnia, Monterotondo, Rome (Italy)), Saltalamacchia, F. (Consiglio per la Ricerca e la Sperimentazione in Agricoltura (CRA) - Istituto Sperimentale per la Zootecnia, Monterotondo, Rome (Italy)), Pacelli, C. (Basilicata Univ., Potenza (Italy). Dipartimento di Scienze delle Produzioni Animali), Rosa, G. De (Naples Univ. (Italy). Dipartimento di Scienze Zootecniche e Ispezione Alimenti)
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The aim of this study was to evaluate the repeatability of some animal related variables, which could be used in protocols developed for assessing animal welfare at farm level. Recordings were performed in seven dairy farms (four for cattle and three for buffaloes). The animals were observed on three occasions at three-week intervals. The variables collected for each animal were the following: behaviour during milking (stepping and kicking), avoidance distance, lameness and cleanliness. For each farm and each variable repeatability was computed using the Kendall coefficient of concordance (W). In buffalo farms avoidance distance may be considered highly reliable (W > 0.64), whereas in dairy cattle its reliability ranged from medium (W = 0.43 to 0.59) to high (W = 0.64). Behavioural recordings at milking showed that the reliability of stepping was either medium or high for both buffaloes and cattle (W = 0.51 to 0.66 and W = 0.52 to 0.76 for buffaloes and cattle, respectively). Conversely, kicking was less reliable. In cattle farms the reliability for cleanliness ranged from medium (W = 0.51) to high (W = 0.62 to 0.71), whereas, it was not reliable in the sole buffalo farm where this variable was monitored. In cattle farms, the concordance for lameness score was high in two farms (W = 0.62 and 0.66) and moderate in one farm (W = 0.43), whereas no animals displayed lameness in the fourth farm. In all buffalo farms no animals showed lameness. For each species, the Kruskal-Wallis analysis of variance with one factor (farm) was performed to evaluate the effect of farm on recorded variables. For cattle, avoidance distance (P
ISSN:1594-4077
1828-051X
1828-051X
DOI:10.4081/ijas.2005.223