Fear and Loathing in College Classrooms: A Survey of Political Science Department Chairs Regarding Political Bias

Some conservative critics of higher education have asserted that the current generation of American professors, especially those in the social sciences and humanities, are using their classrooms to advance a liberal political agenda. As evidence, they point to surveys of the political leanings of fa...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of political science education 2007-09, Vol.3 (3), p.251-264
Hauptverfasser: Losco, Joseph, DeOllos, Ione
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Some conservative critics of higher education have asserted that the current generation of American professors, especially those in the social sciences and humanities, are using their classrooms to advance a liberal political agenda. As evidence, they point to surveys of the political leanings of faculty and have accumulated examples of individual professors they allege to have made inflammatory statements veering from standards of academic objectivity and who punish undergraduates for expressing differing points of view. We surveyed political science department chairs at primarily undergraduate institutions to gather their perceptions about the scope of political bias in the classroom and the institutional procedures available to them to deal with student complaints about such practices. Our results indicate that chairs are indeed sensitive to concerns about faculty who cross the line from legitimate political expression to proselytizing in the classroom. By and large, however, they do not believe such activities are widespread and they believe that their institutions already have in place procedures that treat all parties fairly when political disagreements arise between students and faculty. The data show strong support for academic freedom across public, private, and religious institutions but reveal some differences in the social and political perspectives they promote.
ISSN:1551-2169
1551-2177
DOI:10.1080/15512160701558265