"Whoa... Welcome to America!": Supporting Refugee Background Students' Socioemotional Well-Being, English Language Development, and Content Area Learning

In this qualitative case study, we draw from a larger, federally funded, multiyear study focused on preparing teachers to work with English language learners, which includes an increasing population of refugee background students. We report on the experiences and perspectives of two experienced uppe...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of research in childhood education 2021-07, Vol.35 (3), p.417-437
Hauptverfasser: Newcomer, Sarah N., Ardasheva, Yuliya, Morrison, Judith A., Ernst-Slavit, Gisela, Morrison, Steven J., Carbonneau, Kira J., Lightner, Lindsay K.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:In this qualitative case study, we draw from a larger, federally funded, multiyear study focused on preparing teachers to work with English language learners, which includes an increasing population of refugee background students. We report on the experiences and perspectives of two experienced upper elementary teachers teaching in a magnet school for refugee students, who make up 75% of the school's population. The school is in a medium-sized school district in southeastern Washington State. Applying a culturally responsive, humanizing pedagogical perspective to our analysis of interviews, observations, and artifacts, a number of themes describing similar and different ways the teachers supported their students' socioemotional well-being and learning emerged. The main similarities included: (1) opening up space for students to share their personal experiences; (2) partnering with families in support of cross-cultural understandings; and (3) scaffolding instruction, especially through modeling, schema building, and contextualizing. The main differences included: (1) approaches to relationship-building (focus on teacher-student versus student-student support systems), (2) ways of relating to students' personal lives and background experiences (primary reliance on in- versus out-of-school support systems), and (3) differentiating for the varying levels of English language proficiency (e.g., differences in native language use).
ISSN:0256-8543
2150-2641
DOI:10.1080/02568543.2020.1734697