Evaluation of Academic Competencies Through Standardized Instruments: A Comparison of CompeUEM, LPA-Q, and ESCI-U
The aim of this investigation is to assess the correlation among different competencies-assessment systems available on the market to measure social skills in the university environment. In order to carry out the research, three self-perception competency tests were used, and 30 competencies were ev...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Higher learning research communications 2018-06, Vol.8 (1), p.1-15 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 15 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 1 |
| container_title | Higher learning research communications |
| container_volume | 8 |
| creator | Gómez, Gema Santiago Duarte, Sara Redondo López, Oscar Garcia |
| description | The aim of this investigation is to assess the correlation among different competencies-assessment systems available on the market to measure social skills in the university environment. In order to carry out the research, three self-perception competency tests were used, and 30 competencies were evaluated in a Likert scale with several response levels: the LPA-Q, the ESCI-U, and the CompeUEM. The three questionnaires were completed by 57 university students. The results show a low degree of agreement among the different questionnaires in relation to measuring the same competencies, as well as an unclear factor structure. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.18870/hlrc.v8i1.395 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_eric_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_eric_primary_EJ1180302</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1180302</ericid><sourcerecordid>2102830150</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-e120t-c3da3331c927aa890178bb292ef9fe3a985abedbe02e0c80464f7e08e6915f613</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNjsFLwzAYxYMoOOau3oSA13XmS9Y28VZG1clEZdu5pOlXl7G2W9IO9K-3bB58l_fg8Xs8Qm6BTUDKmD1sds5MjtLCRKjwggw4hHEQ8XB6-S9fk5H3W9ZLhhwUDMghPepdp1vb1LQpaWJ0gZU1dNZUe2yxNhY9XW1c031t6LLVdaFdYX-woPPat66rsG79I01OgHbWn3dO-Dp9G9PFRxJ8jmkP0nQ5mwfrG3JV6p3H0Z8PyfopXc1egsX783yWLAIEztrAiEILIcAoHmstFYNY5jlXHEtVotBKhjrHIkfGkRnJptG0jJFJjBSEZQRiSO7Ou-isyfbOVtp9Z-krgGSC8b6_P_d71xw69G22bTpX95cyDoxLwSBk4hchy2XG</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2102830150</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of Academic Competencies Through Standardized Instruments: A Comparison of CompeUEM, LPA-Q, and ESCI-U</title><source>ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery)</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Gómez, Gema Santiago ; Duarte, Sara Redondo ; López, Oscar Garcia</creator><creatorcontrib>Gómez, Gema Santiago ; Duarte, Sara Redondo ; López, Oscar Garcia</creatorcontrib><description>The aim of this investigation is to assess the correlation among different competencies-assessment systems available on the market to measure social skills in the university environment. In order to carry out the research, three self-perception competency tests were used, and 30 competencies were evaluated in a Likert scale with several response levels: the LPA-Q, the ESCI-U, and the CompeUEM. The three questionnaires were completed by 57 university students. The results show a low degree of agreement among the different questionnaires in relation to measuring the same competencies, as well as an unclear factor structure.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2157-6254</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2157-6254</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.18870/hlrc.v8i1.395</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Joshua Tree: Scholarworks</publisher><subject>Adaptation ; Adjustment (to Environment) ; Assessment centers ; Cognition & reasoning ; College Students ; Communication Skills ; Competence ; Correlation ; Decision Making ; Evaluation Methods ; Foreign Countries ; Higher education ; Intelligence tests ; Interpersonal Competence ; Knowledge Level ; Labor market ; Leadership ; Learning ; Likert Scales ; Personality ; Planning ; Problem Solving ; Questionnaires ; Self Concept ; Social skills ; Standardized Tests ; Statistical Analysis ; Student Attitudes ; Teamwork ; Thinking Skills ; Time Management ; Undergraduate Students ; University students</subject><ispartof>Higher learning research communications, 2018-06, Vol.8 (1), p.1-15</ispartof><rights>2018. This work is published under NOCC (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,688,777,781,861,882,27905,27906</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1180302$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gómez, Gema Santiago</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duarte, Sara Redondo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>López, Oscar Garcia</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of Academic Competencies Through Standardized Instruments: A Comparison of CompeUEM, LPA-Q, and ESCI-U</title><title>Higher learning research communications</title><description>The aim of this investigation is to assess the correlation among different competencies-assessment systems available on the market to measure social skills in the university environment. In order to carry out the research, three self-perception competency tests were used, and 30 competencies were evaluated in a Likert scale with several response levels: the LPA-Q, the ESCI-U, and the CompeUEM. The three questionnaires were completed by 57 university students. The results show a low degree of agreement among the different questionnaires in relation to measuring the same competencies, as well as an unclear factor structure.</description><subject>Adaptation</subject><subject>Adjustment (to Environment)</subject><subject>Assessment centers</subject><subject>Cognition & reasoning</subject><subject>College Students</subject><subject>Communication Skills</subject><subject>Competence</subject><subject>Correlation</subject><subject>Decision Making</subject><subject>Evaluation Methods</subject><subject>Foreign Countries</subject><subject>Higher education</subject><subject>Intelligence tests</subject><subject>Interpersonal Competence</subject><subject>Knowledge Level</subject><subject>Labor market</subject><subject>Leadership</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Likert Scales</subject><subject>Personality</subject><subject>Planning</subject><subject>Problem Solving</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Self Concept</subject><subject>Social skills</subject><subject>Standardized Tests</subject><subject>Statistical Analysis</subject><subject>Student Attitudes</subject><subject>Teamwork</subject><subject>Thinking Skills</subject><subject>Time Management</subject><subject>Undergraduate Students</subject><subject>University students</subject><issn>2157-6254</issn><issn>2157-6254</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GA5</sourceid><recordid>eNpNjsFLwzAYxYMoOOau3oSA13XmS9Y28VZG1clEZdu5pOlXl7G2W9IO9K-3bB58l_fg8Xs8Qm6BTUDKmD1sds5MjtLCRKjwggw4hHEQ8XB6-S9fk5H3W9ZLhhwUDMghPepdp1vb1LQpaWJ0gZU1dNZUe2yxNhY9XW1c031t6LLVdaFdYX-woPPat66rsG79I01OgHbWn3dO-Dp9G9PFRxJ8jmkP0nQ5mwfrG3JV6p3H0Z8PyfopXc1egsX783yWLAIEztrAiEILIcAoHmstFYNY5jlXHEtVotBKhjrHIkfGkRnJptG0jJFJjBSEZQRiSO7Ou-isyfbOVtp9Z-krgGSC8b6_P_d71xw69G22bTpX95cyDoxLwSBk4hchy2XG</recordid><startdate>20180601</startdate><enddate>20180601</enddate><creator>Gómez, Gema Santiago</creator><creator>Duarte, Sara Redondo</creator><creator>López, Oscar Garcia</creator><general>Scholarworks</general><general>Laureate Education, Inc</general><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>GA5</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180601</creationdate><title>Evaluation of Academic Competencies Through Standardized Instruments: A Comparison of CompeUEM, LPA-Q, and ESCI-U</title><author>Gómez, Gema Santiago ; Duarte, Sara Redondo ; López, Oscar Garcia</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-e120t-c3da3331c927aa890178bb292ef9fe3a985abedbe02e0c80464f7e08e6915f613</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Adaptation</topic><topic>Adjustment (to Environment)</topic><topic>Assessment centers</topic><topic>Cognition & reasoning</topic><topic>College Students</topic><topic>Communication Skills</topic><topic>Competence</topic><topic>Correlation</topic><topic>Decision Making</topic><topic>Evaluation Methods</topic><topic>Foreign Countries</topic><topic>Higher education</topic><topic>Intelligence tests</topic><topic>Interpersonal Competence</topic><topic>Knowledge Level</topic><topic>Labor market</topic><topic>Leadership</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Likert Scales</topic><topic>Personality</topic><topic>Planning</topic><topic>Problem Solving</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Self Concept</topic><topic>Social skills</topic><topic>Standardized Tests</topic><topic>Statistical Analysis</topic><topic>Student Attitudes</topic><topic>Teamwork</topic><topic>Thinking Skills</topic><topic>Time Management</topic><topic>Undergraduate Students</topic><topic>University students</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gómez, Gema Santiago</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duarte, Sara Redondo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>López, Oscar Garcia</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery)</collection><jtitle>Higher learning research communications</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gómez, Gema Santiago</au><au>Duarte, Sara Redondo</au><au>López, Oscar Garcia</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1180302</ericid><atitle>Evaluation of Academic Competencies Through Standardized Instruments: A Comparison of CompeUEM, LPA-Q, and ESCI-U</atitle><jtitle>Higher learning research communications</jtitle><date>2018-06-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>15</epage><pages>1-15</pages><issn>2157-6254</issn><eissn>2157-6254</eissn><abstract>The aim of this investigation is to assess the correlation among different competencies-assessment systems available on the market to measure social skills in the university environment. In order to carry out the research, three self-perception competency tests were used, and 30 competencies were evaluated in a Likert scale with several response levels: the LPA-Q, the ESCI-U, and the CompeUEM. The three questionnaires were completed by 57 university students. The results show a low degree of agreement among the different questionnaires in relation to measuring the same competencies, as well as an unclear factor structure.</abstract><cop>Joshua Tree</cop><pub>Scholarworks</pub><doi>10.18870/hlrc.v8i1.395</doi><tpages>15</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 2157-6254 |
| ispartof | Higher learning research communications, 2018-06, Vol.8 (1), p.1-15 |
| issn | 2157-6254 2157-6254 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_eric_primary_EJ1180302 |
| source | ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery); DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
| subjects | Adaptation Adjustment (to Environment) Assessment centers Cognition & reasoning College Students Communication Skills Competence Correlation Decision Making Evaluation Methods Foreign Countries Higher education Intelligence tests Interpersonal Competence Knowledge Level Labor market Leadership Learning Likert Scales Personality Planning Problem Solving Questionnaires Self Concept Social skills Standardized Tests Statistical Analysis Student Attitudes Teamwork Thinking Skills Time Management Undergraduate Students University students |
| title | Evaluation of Academic Competencies Through Standardized Instruments: A Comparison of CompeUEM, LPA-Q, and ESCI-U |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T18%3A03%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_eric_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20Academic%20Competencies%20Through%20Standardized%20Instruments:%20A%20Comparison%20of%20CompeUEM,%20LPA-Q,%20and%20ESCI-U&rft.jtitle=Higher%20learning%20research%20communications&rft.au=G%C3%B3mez,%20Gema%20Santiago&rft.date=2018-06-01&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=15&rft.pages=1-15&rft.issn=2157-6254&rft.eissn=2157-6254&rft_id=info:doi/10.18870/hlrc.v8i1.395&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_eric_%3E2102830150%3C/proquest_eric_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2102830150&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1180302&rfr_iscdi=true |