Evaluation of Academic Competencies Through Standardized Instruments: A Comparison of CompeUEM, LPA-Q, and ESCI-U

Evaluation of Academic Competencies Through Standardized Instruments: A Comparison of CompeUEM, LPA-Q, and ESCI-U

The aim of this investigation is to assess the correlation among different competencies-assessment systems available on the market to measure social skills in the university environment. In order to carry out the research, three self-perception competency tests were used, and 30 competencies were ev...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Higher learning research communications 2018-06, Vol.8 (1), p.1-15
Hauptverfasser: Gómez, Gema Santiago, Duarte, Sara Redondo, López, Oscar Garcia
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Adaptation
Adjustment (to Environment)
Assessment centers
Cognition & reasoning
College Students
Communication Skills
Competence
Correlation
Decision Making
Evaluation Methods
Foreign Countries
Higher education
Intelligence tests
Interpersonal Competence
Knowledge Level
Labor market
Leadership
Learning
Likert Scales
Personality
Planning
Problem Solving
Questionnaires
Self Concept
Social skills
Standardized Tests
Statistical Analysis
Student Attitudes
Teamwork
Thinking Skills
Time Management
Undergraduate Students
University students
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The aim of this investigation is to assess the correlation among different competencies-assessment systems available on the market to measure social skills in the university environment. In order to carry out the research, three self-perception competency tests were used, and 30 competencies were evaluated in a Likert scale with several response levels: the LPA-Q, the ESCI-U, and the CompeUEM. The three questionnaires were completed by 57 university students. The results show a low degree of agreement among the different questionnaires in relation to measuring the same competencies, as well as an unclear factor structure.
ISSN:2157-6254
2157-6254
DOI:10.18870/hlrc.v8i1.395