Investigating the Application of Automated Writing Evaluation to Chinese Undergraduate English Majors: A Case Study of WriteToLearn
This study investigated the application of WriteToLearn on Chinese undergraduate English majors' essays in terms of its scoring ability and the accuracy of its error feedback. Participants were 163 second-year English majors from a university located in Sichuan province who wrote 326 essays fro...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | CALICO journal 2016-01, Vol.33 (1), p.71-91 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | This study investigated the application of WriteToLearn on Chinese undergraduate English majors' essays in terms of its scoring ability and the accuracy of
its error feedback. Participants were 163 second-year English majors from a university located in Sichuan province who wrote 326 essays from two writing prompts. Each paper was
marked by four human raters as well as WriteToLearn. Many-facet Rasch measurement (MFRM) was conducted to calibrate WriteToLearn's rating
performance in scoring the whole set of essays against those of four trained human raters. In addition, the accuracy of WriteToLearn's feedback on 60
randomly selected essays was compared with the feedback provided by human raters. The two main findings related to scoring were that: (1) WriteToLearn was more
consistent but highly stringent when compared to the four trained human raters in scoring essays; and (2) WriteToLearn failed to score seven essays. In terms of
error feedback, WriteToLearn had an overall precision and recall of 49% and 18.7% respectively. These figures did not meet the minimum threshold of
90% precision (set by Burstein, Chodorow, and Leacock, 2003) for it to be considered a reliable error detecting tool. Furthermore, it had difficulty in identifying errors
made by Chinese undergraduate English majors in the use of articles, prepositions, word choice and expression. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0742-7778 2056-9017 2056-9017 |
DOI: | 10.1558/cj.v33i1.26380 |