State, District, and School Implementation of Reforms Promoted under the Recovery Act: 2009-10 through 2011-12. The Final Report from Charting the Progress of Education Reform: An Evaluation of the Recovery Act's Role. NCEE 2015-4016

This report, based on surveys completed by all 50 State Education Agencies (SEAs) and the District of Columbia (DC) and nationally representative samples of districts and schools during spring 2011 and 2012, examines implementation of the key education reform strategies promoted by the Recovery Act...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance 2015
Hauptverfasser: Troppe, Patricia, Milanowski, Anthony, Garrison-Mogren, Roberta, Webber, Ann, Gutmann, Babette, Reisner, Elizabeth, Goertz, Margaret
Format: Report
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:This report, based on surveys completed by all 50 State Education Agencies (SEAs) and the District of Columbia (DC) and nationally representative samples of districts and schools during spring 2011 and 2012, examines implementation of the key education reform strategies promoted by the Recovery Act in 2011-12, the extent to which implementation reflected progress since Recovery Act funds were first distributed, and challenges with implementation. Findings showed variation in the prevalence and progress of reform activities across the areas of reform assessed and by state, district, or school level. Implementation progress was most consistent across the areas of reform at the state level. At all levels, implementation challenges related to educator evaluation and compensation were common. The following are appended: (1) Methodology; (2) Indicators, Components, and Recovery Act Program Requirements; (3) Detailed Tables for Standards and Assessments Chapter; (4) Detailed Tables for Data Systems Chapter; (5) Detailed Tables for Educator Workforce Development Chapter; (6) Detailed Tables for Improving Low-Performing Schools Chapter; and (6) Detailed Tables for Reforms Across Assurance Areas Chapter.