Characteristics of Midwest Region School Districts Identified for Improvement. Summary. Issues & Answers. REL 2012-No. 121
This report presents statistical profiles for the Midwest Region states of school districts designated as "in improvement" for school year 2009/10 under accountability provisions of the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 and compares the prevalence and characteristics of these districts and...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Regional Educational Laboratory Midwest 2012 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
| Format: | Report |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | |
|---|---|
| container_issue | |
| container_start_page | |
| container_title | Regional Educational Laboratory Midwest |
| container_volume | |
| creator | van der Ploeg, Arie Wan, Yinmei Garcia, Alicia N Wraight, Sara Burke, Matthew Norbury, Heather Gerdeman, R. Dean |
| description | This report presents statistical profiles for the Midwest Region states of school districts designated as "in improvement" for school year 2009/10 under accountability provisions of the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 and compares the prevalence and characteristics of these districts and those of districts not in improvement. It also reports the prevalence of districts in need of improvement under three states' own accountability systems. [For the full report, "Characteristics of Midwest Region School Districts Identified for Improvement. Issues & Answers. REL 2012-No. 121," see ED532663.] |
| format | Report |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>eric_GA5</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_eric_primary_ED532665</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>ED532665</ericid><sourcerecordid>ED532665</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-eric_primary_ED5326653</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFjrEOgjAURVkcjPoHDm9yo5ES2A1gJFEHcDdNeZUmlJK-ItGvFxN3p5vcc3Nyl8E7a4UT0qPT5LUksAouupmQPFT40LaHWrbWdpDPA6elJygb7L1WGhtQ1kFpBmefaOaSQT0aI9yLQUk0IsEODj1N6IhBVZyB7yMeXi2DiEfrYKFER7j55SrYHotbdgrnL_I-OP0V3Ys8iXmaJvEf_AF8OEFH</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>report</recordtype></control><display><type>report</type><title>Characteristics of Midwest Region School Districts Identified for Improvement. Summary. Issues & Answers. REL 2012-No. 121</title><source>ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery)</source><creator>van der Ploeg, Arie ; Wan, Yinmei ; Garcia, Alicia N ; Wraight, Sara ; Burke, Matthew ; Norbury, Heather ; Gerdeman, R. Dean</creator><creatorcontrib>van der Ploeg, Arie ; Wan, Yinmei ; Garcia, Alicia N ; Wraight, Sara ; Burke, Matthew ; Norbury, Heather ; Gerdeman, R. Dean ; Regional Educational Laboratory Midwest (ED)</creatorcontrib><description>This report presents statistical profiles for the Midwest Region states of school districts designated as "in improvement" for school year 2009/10 under accountability provisions of the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 and compares the prevalence and characteristics of these districts and those of districts not in improvement. It also reports the prevalence of districts in need of improvement under three states' own accountability systems. [For the full report, "Characteristics of Midwest Region School Districts Identified for Improvement. Issues & Answers. REL 2012-No. 121," see ED532663.]</description><language>eng</language><publisher>Regional Educational Laboratory Midwest</publisher><subject>Accountability ; Comparative Analysis ; Educational Improvement ; Educational Indicators ; Educational Legislation ; Elementary Secondary Education ; Federal Legislation ; Illinois ; Incidence ; Indiana ; Iowa ; Michigan ; Minnesota ; No Child Left Behind Act 2001 ; Ohio ; Profiles ; School Districts ; United States (Midwest) ; Wisconsin</subject><ispartof>Regional Educational Laboratory Midwest, 2012</ispartof><tpages>6</tpages><format>6</format><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,690,780,885,4490</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=ED532665$$EView_record_in_ERIC_Clearinghouse_on_Information_&_Technology$$FView_record_in_$$GERIC_Clearinghouse_on_Information_&_Technology$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=ED532665$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>van der Ploeg, Arie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wan, Yinmei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garcia, Alicia N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wraight, Sara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burke, Matthew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Norbury, Heather</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gerdeman, R. Dean</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Regional Educational Laboratory Midwest (ED)</creatorcontrib><title>Characteristics of Midwest Region School Districts Identified for Improvement. Summary. Issues & Answers. REL 2012-No. 121</title><title>Regional Educational Laboratory Midwest</title><description>This report presents statistical profiles for the Midwest Region states of school districts designated as "in improvement" for school year 2009/10 under accountability provisions of the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 and compares the prevalence and characteristics of these districts and those of districts not in improvement. It also reports the prevalence of districts in need of improvement under three states' own accountability systems. [For the full report, "Characteristics of Midwest Region School Districts Identified for Improvement. Issues & Answers. REL 2012-No. 121," see ED532663.]</description><subject>Accountability</subject><subject>Comparative Analysis</subject><subject>Educational Improvement</subject><subject>Educational Indicators</subject><subject>Educational Legislation</subject><subject>Elementary Secondary Education</subject><subject>Federal Legislation</subject><subject>Illinois</subject><subject>Incidence</subject><subject>Indiana</subject><subject>Iowa</subject><subject>Michigan</subject><subject>Minnesota</subject><subject>No Child Left Behind Act 2001</subject><subject>Ohio</subject><subject>Profiles</subject><subject>School Districts</subject><subject>United States (Midwest)</subject><subject>Wisconsin</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>report</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>report</recordtype><sourceid>GA5</sourceid><recordid>eNqFjrEOgjAURVkcjPoHDm9yo5ES2A1gJFEHcDdNeZUmlJK-ItGvFxN3p5vcc3Nyl8E7a4UT0qPT5LUksAouupmQPFT40LaHWrbWdpDPA6elJygb7L1WGhtQ1kFpBmefaOaSQT0aI9yLQUk0IsEODj1N6IhBVZyB7yMeXi2DiEfrYKFER7j55SrYHotbdgrnL_I-OP0V3Ys8iXmaJvEf_AF8OEFH</recordid><startdate>201203</startdate><enddate>201203</enddate><creator>van der Ploeg, Arie</creator><creator>Wan, Yinmei</creator><creator>Garcia, Alicia N</creator><creator>Wraight, Sara</creator><creator>Burke, Matthew</creator><creator>Norbury, Heather</creator><creator>Gerdeman, R. Dean</creator><general>Regional Educational Laboratory Midwest</general><scope>ERI</scope><scope>GA5</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201203</creationdate><title>Characteristics of Midwest Region School Districts Identified for Improvement. Summary. Issues & Answers. REL 2012-No. 121</title><author>van der Ploeg, Arie ; Wan, Yinmei ; Garcia, Alicia N ; Wraight, Sara ; Burke, Matthew ; Norbury, Heather ; Gerdeman, R. Dean</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-eric_primary_ED5326653</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>reports</rsrctype><prefilter>reports</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Accountability</topic><topic>Comparative Analysis</topic><topic>Educational Improvement</topic><topic>Educational Indicators</topic><topic>Educational Legislation</topic><topic>Elementary Secondary Education</topic><topic>Federal Legislation</topic><topic>Illinois</topic><topic>Incidence</topic><topic>Indiana</topic><topic>Iowa</topic><topic>Michigan</topic><topic>Minnesota</topic><topic>No Child Left Behind Act 2001</topic><topic>Ohio</topic><topic>Profiles</topic><topic>School Districts</topic><topic>United States (Midwest)</topic><topic>Wisconsin</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>van der Ploeg, Arie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wan, Yinmei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garcia, Alicia N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wraight, Sara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burke, Matthew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Norbury, Heather</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gerdeman, R. Dean</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Regional Educational Laboratory Midwest (ED)</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery)</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>van der Ploeg, Arie</au><au>Wan, Yinmei</au><au>Garcia, Alicia N</au><au>Wraight, Sara</au><au>Burke, Matthew</au><au>Norbury, Heather</au><au>Gerdeman, R. Dean</au><aucorp>Regional Educational Laboratory Midwest (ED)</aucorp><format>book</format><genre>unknown</genre><ristype>RPRT</ristype><ericid>ED532665</ericid><atitle>Characteristics of Midwest Region School Districts Identified for Improvement. Summary. Issues & Answers. REL 2012-No. 121</atitle><jtitle>Regional Educational Laboratory Midwest</jtitle><date>2012-03</date><risdate>2012</risdate><abstract>This report presents statistical profiles for the Midwest Region states of school districts designated as "in improvement" for school year 2009/10 under accountability provisions of the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 and compares the prevalence and characteristics of these districts and those of districts not in improvement. It also reports the prevalence of districts in need of improvement under three states' own accountability systems. [For the full report, "Characteristics of Midwest Region School Districts Identified for Improvement. Issues & Answers. REL 2012-No. 121," see ED532663.]</abstract><pub>Regional Educational Laboratory Midwest</pub><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| identifier | |
| ispartof | Regional Educational Laboratory Midwest, 2012 |
| issn | |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_eric_primary_ED532665 |
| source | ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery) |
| subjects | Accountability Comparative Analysis Educational Improvement Educational Indicators Educational Legislation Elementary Secondary Education Federal Legislation Illinois Incidence Indiana Iowa Michigan Minnesota No Child Left Behind Act 2001 Ohio Profiles School Districts United States (Midwest) Wisconsin |
| title | Characteristics of Midwest Region School Districts Identified for Improvement. Summary. Issues & Answers. REL 2012-No. 121 |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T03%3A57%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-eric_GA5&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=unknown&rft.atitle=Characteristics%20of%20Midwest%20Region%20School%20Districts%20Identified%20for%20Improvement.%20Summary.%20Issues%20&%20Answers.%20REL%202012-No.%20121&rft.jtitle=Regional%20Educational%20Laboratory%20Midwest&rft.au=van%20der%20Ploeg,%20Arie&rft.aucorp=Regional%20Educational%20Laboratory%20Midwest%20(ED)&rft.date=2012-03&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Ceric_GA5%3EED532665%3C/eric_GA5%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=ED532665&rfr_iscdi=true |