Graduate Record Examination (GRE) Scores as an Assessment Tool. AIR 1998 Annual Forum Paper

This paper examines whether graduate record examination (GRE) scores are a legitimate assessment tool for measuring institutional accountability and effectiveness that is, how well its graduates will do after having attended the institution for four or more years. Following a discussion of the vario...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Underwood, David G, Craighead, Michelle M
Format: Report
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title
container_volume
creator Underwood, David G
Craighead, Michelle M
description This paper examines whether graduate record examination (GRE) scores are a legitimate assessment tool for measuring institutional accountability and effectiveness that is, how well its graduates will do after having attended the institution for four or more years. Following a discussion of the various pros and cons of using the GRE as an accountability measure, the study reports on an examination of all GRE reports for five years (May 1992-May 1997) collected at a land-grant research university in the southeast (n=2,934). Regression models were developed using Scholastic Assessment Test verbal and math scores, gender, race, cumulative credit hours, and grade point averages to create predicted GRE total, quantitative, verbal, and analytical scores. Then the predicted GRE scores were subtracted from the actual GRE scores to provide a residual score, which was analyzed by major to determine whether any of the residuals were greater than expected through random variation. Significant differences were found to exist based on the mean of the residuals by major, and these were further analyzed. The report concludes that using this assessment approach leaves unanswered the question of whether the information garnered can be used to improve programs and services of the institution. (Contains 7 references.)(CH)
format Report
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>eric_GA5</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_eric_primary_ED422802</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>ED422802</ericid><sourcerecordid>ED422802</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-eric_primary_ED4228023</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFiT0LwjAUALs4iPoPHN6og6LVoR2DptVNYrcO5dE-IZCP8pKA_ns7uAsHB3fzrK0Zh4SRQFHveQD5RqsdRu0dbGolt_CcOgXACQciBArBkovQeG_2IO4KjmVZgHAuoYHKc7LwwJF4mc1eaAKtfl5k60o2l9uOWPfdyNoifzp5Ped5cchPf_YXtJ81sw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>report</recordtype></control><display><type>report</type><title>Graduate Record Examination (GRE) Scores as an Assessment Tool. AIR 1998 Annual Forum Paper</title><source>ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery)</source><creator>Underwood, David G ; Craighead, Michelle M</creator><creatorcontrib>Underwood, David G ; Craighead, Michelle M</creatorcontrib><description>This paper examines whether graduate record examination (GRE) scores are a legitimate assessment tool for measuring institutional accountability and effectiveness that is, how well its graduates will do after having attended the institution for four or more years. Following a discussion of the various pros and cons of using the GRE as an accountability measure, the study reports on an examination of all GRE reports for five years (May 1992-May 1997) collected at a land-grant research university in the southeast (n=2,934). Regression models were developed using Scholastic Assessment Test verbal and math scores, gender, race, cumulative credit hours, and grade point averages to create predicted GRE total, quantitative, verbal, and analytical scores. Then the predicted GRE scores were subtracted from the actual GRE scores to provide a residual score, which was analyzed by major to determine whether any of the residuals were greater than expected through random variation. Significant differences were found to exist based on the mean of the residuals by major, and these were further analyzed. The report concludes that using this assessment approach leaves unanswered the question of whether the information garnered can be used to improve programs and services of the institution. (Contains 7 references.)(CH)</description><language>eng</language><subject>Accountability ; Accreditation (Institutions) ; AIR Forum ; College Outcomes Assessment ; Correlation ; Evaluation Criteria ; Graduate Record Examinations ; Higher Education ; Institutional Evaluation ; Majors (Students) ; Outcome Based Education ; Predictive Measurement ; Regression (Statistics) ; Scholastic Assessment Tests ; School Effectiveness</subject><creationdate>1998</creationdate><tpages>15</tpages><format>15</format><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,687,776,881,4476</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=ED422802$$EView_record_in_ERIC_Clearinghouse_on_Information_&amp;_Technology$$FView_record_in_$$GERIC_Clearinghouse_on_Information_&amp;_Technology$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=ED422802$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Underwood, David G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Craighead, Michelle M</creatorcontrib><title>Graduate Record Examination (GRE) Scores as an Assessment Tool. AIR 1998 Annual Forum Paper</title><description>This paper examines whether graduate record examination (GRE) scores are a legitimate assessment tool for measuring institutional accountability and effectiveness that is, how well its graduates will do after having attended the institution for four or more years. Following a discussion of the various pros and cons of using the GRE as an accountability measure, the study reports on an examination of all GRE reports for five years (May 1992-May 1997) collected at a land-grant research university in the southeast (n=2,934). Regression models were developed using Scholastic Assessment Test verbal and math scores, gender, race, cumulative credit hours, and grade point averages to create predicted GRE total, quantitative, verbal, and analytical scores. Then the predicted GRE scores were subtracted from the actual GRE scores to provide a residual score, which was analyzed by major to determine whether any of the residuals were greater than expected through random variation. Significant differences were found to exist based on the mean of the residuals by major, and these were further analyzed. The report concludes that using this assessment approach leaves unanswered the question of whether the information garnered can be used to improve programs and services of the institution. (Contains 7 references.)(CH)</description><subject>Accountability</subject><subject>Accreditation (Institutions)</subject><subject>AIR Forum</subject><subject>College Outcomes Assessment</subject><subject>Correlation</subject><subject>Evaluation Criteria</subject><subject>Graduate Record Examinations</subject><subject>Higher Education</subject><subject>Institutional Evaluation</subject><subject>Majors (Students)</subject><subject>Outcome Based Education</subject><subject>Predictive Measurement</subject><subject>Regression (Statistics)</subject><subject>Scholastic Assessment Tests</subject><subject>School Effectiveness</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>report</rsrctype><creationdate>1998</creationdate><recordtype>report</recordtype><sourceid>GA5</sourceid><recordid>eNqFiT0LwjAUALs4iPoPHN6og6LVoR2DptVNYrcO5dE-IZCP8pKA_ns7uAsHB3fzrK0Zh4SRQFHveQD5RqsdRu0dbGolt_CcOgXACQciBArBkovQeG_2IO4KjmVZgHAuoYHKc7LwwJF4mc1eaAKtfl5k60o2l9uOWPfdyNoifzp5Ped5cchPf_YXtJ81sw</recordid><startdate>199805</startdate><enddate>199805</enddate><creator>Underwood, David G</creator><creator>Craighead, Michelle M</creator><scope>ERI</scope><scope>GA5</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199805</creationdate><title>Graduate Record Examination (GRE) Scores as an Assessment Tool. AIR 1998 Annual Forum Paper</title><author>Underwood, David G ; Craighead, Michelle M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-eric_primary_ED4228023</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>reports</rsrctype><prefilter>reports</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1998</creationdate><topic>Accountability</topic><topic>Accreditation (Institutions)</topic><topic>AIR Forum</topic><topic>College Outcomes Assessment</topic><topic>Correlation</topic><topic>Evaluation Criteria</topic><topic>Graduate Record Examinations</topic><topic>Higher Education</topic><topic>Institutional Evaluation</topic><topic>Majors (Students)</topic><topic>Outcome Based Education</topic><topic>Predictive Measurement</topic><topic>Regression (Statistics)</topic><topic>Scholastic Assessment Tests</topic><topic>School Effectiveness</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Underwood, David G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Craighead, Michelle M</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery)</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Underwood, David G</au><au>Craighead, Michelle M</au><format>book</format><genre>unknown</genre><ristype>RPRT</ristype><ericid>ED422802</ericid><btitle>Graduate Record Examination (GRE) Scores as an Assessment Tool. AIR 1998 Annual Forum Paper</btitle><date>1998-05</date><risdate>1998</risdate><abstract>This paper examines whether graduate record examination (GRE) scores are a legitimate assessment tool for measuring institutional accountability and effectiveness that is, how well its graduates will do after having attended the institution for four or more years. Following a discussion of the various pros and cons of using the GRE as an accountability measure, the study reports on an examination of all GRE reports for five years (May 1992-May 1997) collected at a land-grant research university in the southeast (n=2,934). Regression models were developed using Scholastic Assessment Test verbal and math scores, gender, race, cumulative credit hours, and grade point averages to create predicted GRE total, quantitative, verbal, and analytical scores. Then the predicted GRE scores were subtracted from the actual GRE scores to provide a residual score, which was analyzed by major to determine whether any of the residuals were greater than expected through random variation. Significant differences were found to exist based on the mean of the residuals by major, and these were further analyzed. The report concludes that using this assessment approach leaves unanswered the question of whether the information garnered can be used to improve programs and services of the institution. (Contains 7 references.)(CH)</abstract><tpages>15</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier
ispartof
issn
language eng
recordid cdi_eric_primary_ED422802
source ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery)
subjects Accountability
Accreditation (Institutions)
AIR Forum
College Outcomes Assessment
Correlation
Evaluation Criteria
Graduate Record Examinations
Higher Education
Institutional Evaluation
Majors (Students)
Outcome Based Education
Predictive Measurement
Regression (Statistics)
Scholastic Assessment Tests
School Effectiveness
title Graduate Record Examination (GRE) Scores as an Assessment Tool. AIR 1998 Annual Forum Paper
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T17%3A43%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-eric_GA5&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=unknown&rft.btitle=Graduate%20Record%20Examination%20(GRE)%20Scores%20as%20an%20Assessment%20Tool.%20AIR%201998%20Annual%20Forum%20Paper&rft.au=Underwood,%20David%20G&rft.date=1998-05&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Ceric_GA5%3EED422802%3C/eric_GA5%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=ED422802&rfr_iscdi=true