Graduate Record Examination (GRE) Scores as an Assessment Tool. AIR 1998 Annual Forum Paper
This paper examines whether graduate record examination (GRE) scores are a legitimate assessment tool for measuring institutional accountability and effectiveness that is, how well its graduates will do after having attended the institution for four or more years. Following a discussion of the vario...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Report |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | This paper examines whether graduate record examination (GRE) scores are a legitimate assessment tool for measuring institutional accountability and effectiveness that is, how well its graduates will do after having attended the institution for four or more years. Following a discussion of the various pros and cons of using the GRE as an accountability measure, the study reports on an examination of all GRE reports for five years (May 1992-May 1997) collected at a land-grant research university in the southeast (n=2,934). Regression models were developed using Scholastic Assessment Test verbal and math scores, gender, race, cumulative credit hours, and grade point averages to create predicted GRE total, quantitative, verbal, and analytical scores. Then the predicted GRE scores were subtracted from the actual GRE scores to provide a residual score, which was analyzed by major to determine whether any of the residuals were greater than expected through random variation. Significant differences were found to exist based on the mean of the residuals by major, and these were further analyzed. The report concludes that using this assessment approach leaves unanswered the question of whether the information garnered can be used to improve programs and services of the institution. (Contains 7 references.)(CH) |
---|