Making history critical
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to explore a possible discursive history of National Health Service (NHS) “management” (with management, for reasons that will become evident, very much in scare quotes). Such a history is offered as a complement, as well as a counterpoint, to the more traditiona...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of health organization and management 2017-08, Vol.31 (5), p.542-555 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to explore a possible discursive history of National Health Service (NHS) “management” (with management, for reasons that will become evident, very much in scare quotes). Such a history is offered as a complement, as well as a counterpoint, to the more traditional approaches that have already been taken to the history of the issue.
Design/methodology/approach
Document analysis and interviews with UK NHS trust chief executives.
Findings
After explicating the assumptions of the method it suggests, through a range of empirical sources that the NHS has undergone an era of administration, an era of management and an era of leadership.
Research limitations/implications
The paper enables a recasting of the history of the NHS; in particular, the potential for such a discursive history to highlight the interests supported and denied by different representational practices.
Practical implications
Today’s so-called leaders are leaders because of conventional representational practices – not because of some essence about what they really are.
Social implications
New ideas about the nature of management.
Originality/value
The value of thinking in terms of what language does – rather than what it might represent. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1477-7266 1758-7247 |
DOI: | 10.1108/JHOM-11-2016-0213 |