The devil made me do it: business partners in crime

Purpose - The objective of this paper is to challenge some of the rhetoric pertaining to the "harm" caused by "dirty" money infiltrating into the "legitimate economy." The arguments regarding the impact of dirty money have been used to justify enhancements to law enforcement powers, and increasingly invasive investigative strategies and intelligence gathering regimes.Design methodology approach - The paper reviews the literature pertaining to the intersection between "dirty money" and "legitimate business" and looks at how some of the most notorious criminal operations have been handled by the press and the courts. The paper examines corporate complicity in situations involving premeditated, ongoing criminal conduct and discusses two specific ways in which societies acknowledge and accommodate criminality within the operation of these corporations.Findings - The paper argues that one must never minimize the amount of legitimate business that involves dirty money or uses dirty opportunities or was once dirty and is now legitimate or was legitimate and is now dirty.Practical implications - The pretense of a clear separation between criminality and corporate operations is "useful" and is occasionally correct - but not as the norm and ought not to be the operating law enforcement expectation.Originality value - The paper encourages the reader to question the easily repeated claims about the financial threats from stereotypical forms of "organized crime," while either dismissing or re-defining the equally serious, or more serious, activities of professions (lawyers, accountants, bankers, politicians, government officials, corporate CEOs, etc.) operating supposedly legitimately.