The futile fight against (human) nature
Purpose - The paper aims to discuss bureaucratic management, over-confidence in scientific theory, information distortion and lack of coordination with particular focus on the post-Hurricane Katrina situation.Design methodology approach - The paper examines efficiency arguments for centralized contr...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of social economics 2008-07, Vol.35 (8), p.627-638 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Purpose - The paper aims to discuss bureaucratic management, over-confidence in scientific theory, information distortion and lack of coordination with particular focus on the post-Hurricane Katrina situation.Design methodology approach - The paper examines efficiency arguments for centralized control and the potential for government failure. It also analyzes the disaster of Hurricane Katrina with these problems in mind.Findings - The Flood Act of 1928 officially transferred the responsibility of flood protection along the Mississippi River to the federal government. While it is true that local provision failed to eliminate the problem of flooding, the problems caused by federal provision have not been fully appreciated. The specific characteristics of flood protection as well as the general problems caused by bureaucratic management and the absence of market mechanisms suggest that local provision of flood protection is a more efficient solution.Originality value - The arguments in this paper suggest that, the previous belief in centralized flood management was unfounded. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0306-8293 1758-6712 |
DOI: | 10.1108/03068290810889242 |