The moderating effects of cognitive style and recency effects on the auditors′ belief revision process
Auditors′ belief revisions are found to be influenced by the presentation order of audit evidence. The Belief Adjustment model developed by Hogarth and Einhorn predicts recency effects when certain task variables are present. An unanswered question remains: Do individual psychological differences pl...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Managerial auditing journal 1995-12, Vol.10 (9), p.22-28 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Auditors′ belief revisions are found to be influenced by the
presentation order of audit evidence. The Belief Adjustment model
developed by Hogarth and Einhorn predicts recency effects when certain
task variables are present. An unanswered question remains: Do
individual psychological differences play a role in influencing the
recency effect? Reports the findings of an empirical test on recency
effect in auditors′ belief revision process and its relation to the
field dependence cognitive style (a personal individual variable).
Twenty auditor-subjects were asked to complete a questionnaire on an
internal control case using "complex, mixed" evidence in a
step-by-step response mode. The research findings confirmed the
existence of a significant recency effect and showed that the field
dependence cognitive style interacts with the order of evidence to
influence the auditors′ belief-adjustment process. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0268-6902 1758-7735 |
DOI: | 10.1108/02686909510100869 |