Response to: Comment on “Tapered Cuff versus Conventional Cuff for Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia in Ventilated Patients: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials”

Response to: Comment on “Tapered Cuff versus Conventional Cuff for Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia in Ventilated Patients: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials”

We are very glad to hear from Maertens and Blot [1], and they are as concerned about the same important issues as we are. We also read their excellent paper published in critical care medicine [2].

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Canadian respiratory journal 2020-02, Vol.2020 (2020), p.1-2
Hauptverfasser: Ye, Zhang Qiang, Hong, Shao Qing, Wu, Fang Fang, Li, Liu Xia, Du, Yan Ping, Huang, Wei Min, Huang, Xu An, Tang, Fang Xuan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Bacterial pneumonia
Bias
Clinical trials
Critical care
Lavage
Letter to the Editor
Meta-analysis
Pneumonia
Polyvinyl chloride
Studies
Ventilators
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:We are very glad to hear from Maertens and Blot [1], and they are as concerned about the same important issues as we are. We also read their excellent paper published in critical care medicine [2].
ISSN:1198-2241
1916-7245
DOI:10.1155/2020/1601785