Evaluation of persistence, retention “rate” and prescription pattern of original infliximab and infliximab CT-P13 in biologic-naïve patients with ulcerative colitis

To compare the persistence, retention rate and prescription pattern of original infliximab and infliximab CT-P13 in biologic-naive patients with ulcerative colitis. This was an ambispective study of biologic-naive patients with ulcerative colitis who received non-simultaneous first-line treatment wi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Farmacia hospitalaria 2022-09, Vol.46 (5), p.296-300
Hauptverfasser: Valcuende-Rosique, Alejandro, Borrás-Blasco, Joaquín, Martínez-Badal, Sandra, Cortes, Xavier, Aparicio-Rubio, Celia, Casterá-Melchor, Elvira
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng ; spa
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:To compare the persistence, retention rate and prescription pattern of original infliximab and infliximab CT-P13 in biologic-naive patients with ulcerative colitis. This was an ambispective study of biologic-naive patients with ulcerative colitis who received non-simultaneous first-line treatment with Remicade® (infliximab) and Remsima® (infliximab CT-P13) over a 10-year study period (2012-2021). Data on their age, weight, persistence, retention rate and on whether they required intensification or deintensification throughout the study period was collected. The real patient/year cost of Remicade® and Remsima® was determined individually based on the amounts administered during the study period. 27 biologic-naive patients were treated with Remicade® and 53 with Remsima®. Neither patient group presented with differences in terms of weight and age. Persistence (median ± interquartile range) with Remicade® was 42.49 ± 57.48 months, as compared to 27.50 ± 58.50 months for Remsima®, without significant differences (p = 0.455). The retention rate at 6, 12, and 24 months was 81%, 63%, and 33%, respectively, for the Remicade® group and 71%, 47%, and 37%, respectively, for the Remsima® group. Nine subjects in the Remicade® group vs 11 patients in the Remsima® group were intensified. Regarding deintensification, five patients treated with Remicade® were deintensified, as compared with 7 patients on Remsima®. Savings obtained with the use of Remsima® amounted to 203,649 €, which would allow treating an additional 118 patients with biosimilar infliximab for one year. There are no significant differences in persistence, retention, and number of intensifications or deintensifications between biologicna'tve patients treated with Remicade® and those treated with Remsima®, the latter being an effective, safe and economical alternative for the treatment of ulcerative colitis. Comparar la persistencia, tasa de retención y pauta de prescripción de infliximab original e infliximab CT-P13 en pacientes naive a biológicos con colitis ulcerosa. Estudio ambispectivo de pacientes naive a biológicos en colitis ulcerosa que recibieron tratamiento en primera línea con Remicade® (infliximab) y Remsima® (infliximab CT-P13) de forma no simultánea durante un periodo de estudio de 10 años (2012-2021). Se tomaron datos de su edad, peso, persistencia, tasa de retención y si precisó de intensificación o desintensificación a lo largo del periodo de estudio. Se determinó el coste paciente/año rea
ISSN:1130-6343
2171-8695
DOI:10.7399/fh.13232