1125P - Radiotherapy plus cisplatin (CDDP) or cetuximab (C225) in human papilloma-virus (HPV)-associated oropharyngeal cancer (OPC)? A dilemma finally resolved. An updated meta-analysis
Human papilloma virus (HPV)-associated oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) is a special entity among head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCCs) characterised by higher survival rates compared to similar stage HPV-negative OPC. Due to favorable prognosis, a significant interest in ‘’less toxic’’ therapie...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Annals of oncology 2019-10, Vol.30, p.v457-v457 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Human papilloma virus (HPV)-associated oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) is a special entity among head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCCs) characterised by higher survival rates compared to similar stage HPV-negative OPC. Due to favorable prognosis, a significant interest in ‘’less toxic’’ therapies (de-escalating strategies) in the treatment of HPV-associated OPC had been introduced. One of the approaches included introduction of cetuximab (C225) instead of cisplatin (CDDP) in conjunction with radiotherapy as a definitive treatment option in these patients. The aim of the updated meta-analysis was to compare the efficacy of CDDP vs. C225 given concurrently with radiotherapy as definitive treatment of HPV-associated OPC, with inclusion of the latest trials investigating this specific issue. To our knowledge this is currently the largest investigation on this matter.
A systematic literature search was performed for studies published between 2006 and 2018. A total of 1490 citations were obtained and 8 studies met inclusion criteria, resulting in inclusion of 1665 patients in this meta-analysis.
Analysis of pooled studies showed no significant heterogeneity or publication bias. Two-year overall survival (OS) calculated pooled odds ratio (OR) for CDDP-based chemoradiotherapy vs. C225-based bioradiotherapy, was 0.45 (P |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0923-7534 1569-8041 |
DOI: | 10.1093/annonc/mdz252.017 |