Tumor-treating field arrays do not reduce target volume coverage for glioblastoma radiotherapy
AbstractPurposeTo inform development of procedures for using tumor-treating field arrays (TTFields) during glioblastoma radiotherapy by determining whether the placement and repositioning of arrays affects target volume coverage and cranial skin dose. Methods and materialsRadiation plans from ten co...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Advances in radiation oncology 2019 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | AbstractPurposeTo inform development of procedures for using tumor-treating field arrays (TTFields) during glioblastoma radiotherapy by determining whether the placement and repositioning of arrays affects target volume coverage and cranial skin dose. Methods and materialsRadiation plans from ten consecutive patients treated for glioblastoma were copied to a cranial phantom and re-optimized for phantom anatomy. Dose distributions were then recalculated on three additional CT scans of the phantom with the TTFields electrode arrays placed over distinct locations on the phantom scalp, in order to compare planning target volume (PTV) coverage and skin dose with and without TTFields in place in varying positions. Percent depth dose curves were also measured for radiation beams passing through the electrodes and compared to commonly used bolus material. ResultsThe presence of TTFields arrays decreased PTV V97% and D97% by as much as 1.7% and 2.7%, respectively, for a single array position, but this decrease was mitigated by array repositioning. On averaging the three array positions, there was no statistically significant difference in any dosimetric parameter of PTV coverage (V95-97%, D95-97%) across all cases as compared to no array. Mean increases in skin D1cc and D20cc of 3.1% were calculated for the cohort. Surface dose for TTFields electrodes was less than that with 5 mm superflab bolus. ConclusionsOur work demonstrates that placement of TTFields arrays does not significantly affect target volume coverage. We show that repositioning of TTFields arrays, as is required in clinical use, further minimizes any dosimetric changes and eliminates the need for replanning when arrays are moved. A slight, expected bolus effect is observed but the calculated increases in skin dose are not clinically significant. These data support the development of clinical trials to assess the safety and efficacy of combining concurrent chemoradiotherapy with TTFields therapy for glioblastoma. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2452-1094 2452-1094 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.adro.2019.08.005 |