Non-invasive Positive Pressure Ventilation versus Invasive Mechanical Ventilation as First Line Therapy for Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure in Cancer Patients

Non-invasive Positive Pressure Ventilation versus Invasive Mechanical Ventilation as First Line Therapy for Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure in Cancer Patients

Highlights • Large cohort of 1614 cancer patients with hypoxemic respiratory failure • Patients who failed non-invasive ventilation as first line treatment had lower survival rates than those who succeeded or those who were intubated • Younger age, non-Caucasian race, hematological malignancy and a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of critical care 2017
Hauptverfasser: Rathi, Nisha K., MD, Haque, Sajid A., MD, Nates, Ron, BS, Kosturakis, Alyssa, BS, Wang, Hao, BS, Dong, Wenli, MS, Feng, Lei, MS, Erfe, Rose J., BS, Guarjardo, Christina, BA, Withers, Laura, RRT, Finch, Clarence, RRT, Price, Kristen J., MD, Nates, Joseph L., MD
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Critical Care
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Highlights • Large cohort of 1614 cancer patients with hypoxemic respiratory failure • Patients who failed non-invasive ventilation as first line treatment had lower survival rates than those who succeeded or those who were intubated • Younger age, non-Caucasian race, hematological malignancy and a higher SOFA score were independent predictors of failure • No difference in mortality between early versus late intubation
ISSN:0883-9441
DOI:10.1016/j.jcrc.2017.01.007