Hyperthermic isolated limb perfusion. The switch from Steinman pins to Omnitract assisted isolation

Abstract Background Hyperthermic isolated limb perfusion (HILP) represents an alternative to amputation for patients with either in-transit melanoma or unresectable soft tissue sarcoma, entailing delivery of high-dose chemotherapy after isolation of the extremity, under hyperthermic conditions. Stabilization of the Esmarch elastic bandage is so far performed with the use of Steinmann pins. In this study, we presented our experience with HILP and demonstrated an alternative technique for limb isolation using an Omnitract retractor instead of the traditional Steinmann pin, while comparing the two methods. Methods Forty patients, 28 with recurrent in-transit melanoma and 12 with locally advanced/recurrent sarcoma of the limbs, underwent HILP in a single institution and were included in the study. The Steinmann pin was applied in the first 23 cases, whereas the Omnitract retractor was applied in the latter 17 patients. Results The median follow-up for the whole study group was 17.5 mo, whereas the overall response rate was 92.9% for melanoma and 75% for sarcoma patients. Both overall survival and local progression-free survival differed significantly between patients with complete response and those with partial response, stable disease or progressive disease. The use of the Omni-tract retractor was advantageous in every examined field, with the overall complication rate, duration of analgesic administration, and total opioid and paracetamol dose, being significantly less in the Omni-tract patient group. Conclusions Although this study was not a randomized trial, we consider that the noninvasive application of the Omni-tract retractor will gain significant acceptance, by contributing to the reduction of HILP complications.