Cardiometabolic Syndrome in People with Spinal Cord Injury/Disease: Guideline-derived and Non-Guideline Risk Components in a Pooled Sample

Abstract Objective Assess cardiometabolic syndrome (CMS) risk definitions in spinal cord injury/disease (SCI/D). Design Cross-sectional analysis of a pooled sample. Setting Two SCI/D academic medical and rehabilitation centers. Participants Baseline data from subjects in seven clinical studies were...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation 2016
Hauptverfasser: Nash, Mark S., Ph.D, Tractenberg, Rochelle E., Ph.D., MPH, Mendez, Armando J., Ph.D, David, Maya, Ljungberg, Inger H., MPH, Tinsley, Emily A., MS, Burns, Patricia A., MS, Betancourt, Luisa F., MD, MS, Groah, Suzanne L., MD, MSPH
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Objective Assess cardiometabolic syndrome (CMS) risk definitions in spinal cord injury/disease (SCI/D). Design Cross-sectional analysis of a pooled sample. Setting Two SCI/D academic medical and rehabilitation centers. Participants Baseline data from subjects in seven clinical studies were pooled; not all variables were collected in all studies so that participant numbers varied from 119-389. The pooled sample included males (79%) and females (21%) with SCI/D >1 year at spinal cord levels spanning C3-T2 (AIS A-D). Interventions Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures We computed the prevalence of CMS using the American Heart Association (AHA)/National Heart Lung Blood Institute (NHLBI) guideline (CMS diagnosis as sum-of-risks (SUM-OF-RISKS) ≥ 3) for the following risk components: overweight/obesity, insulin resistance, hypertension, and dyslipidemia. We compared this prevalence with the risk calculated from two routinely used non-guideline CMS risk assessments: 1) key cut-scores identifying insulin resistance derived from the Homeostatic Model 2 (HOMA2) method or Quantitative Insulin Sensitivity Check Index (QUICKI), and, 2) a cardioendocrine risk ratio based upon an inflammation (C-Reactive Protein [CRP]) - adjusted Total Cholesterol (TC): High-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C) ratio. Results After adjustment for multiple comparisons, injury level and AIS were unrelated to CMS or risk factors. 13% and 32.1% of participants had CMS when using the sum-of-risks or HOMA2/QUICKI model, respectively. Overweight-obesity and (pre)hypertension were highly prevalent (83% and 62.1%, respectively), with risk for overweight-obesity being significantly associated with CMS diagnosis (sum-of-risks χ2 =10.105, adjusted p=0.008). Insulin resistance was significantly associated with CMS when using the HOMA2/QUICKI model (χ2 (2) =21.23, adjusted p
ISSN:0003-9993
DOI:10.1016/j.apmr.2016.07.002