Root Cause Analysis for the ATIRCM/CMWS Program

We studied the Advanced Threat Infrared Countermeasure & Common Missile Warning System (ATIRCM/CMWS) program to understand the root cause of its recent critical Nunn-McCurdy Breach. We discovered two causes. First, neither system was technically mature enough when the program was granted Milesto...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Balaban, Harold S, Kodzwa, Paul M, Rehwinkel, Andrew S, Davis, Gregory A, Bronson, Patricia F
Format: Report
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title
container_volume
creator Balaban, Harold S
Kodzwa, Paul M
Rehwinkel, Andrew S
Davis, Gregory A
Bronson, Patricia F
description We studied the Advanced Threat Infrared Countermeasure & Common Missile Warning System (ATIRCM/CMWS) program to understand the root cause of its recent critical Nunn-McCurdy Breach. We discovered two causes. First, neither system was technically mature enough when the program was granted Milestone II authority in 1996 and this has caused numerous technical problems resulting in large cost growth in non-recurring engineering. The inaccurate technological maturity assessments led to unrealistic baseline estimates for both cost and schedule. Second, the combined weight of the two systems is far in excess of that specified in the operational requirements document from Milestone II and no major effort was made to reduce it. Because of the weight, the system could not be used as a fleet-wide solution, as envisioned at Milestone II. Consequently, a quantity reduction was inevitable, leading to growth in unit cost. We also found that this program has used methods for quantity accounting that may have become inconsistent with statute. While quantity accounting has not caused cost growth, it has somewhat obscured it.
format Report
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>dtic_1RU</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_dtic_stinet_ADA555310</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>ADA555310</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-dtic_stinet_ADA5553103</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNrjZNAPys8vUXBOLC1OVXDMS8ypLM4sVkjLL1IoyQAKhHgGOfvqO_uGBysEFOWnFyXm8jCwpiXmFKfyQmluBhk31xBnD92Ukszk-OKSzLzUknhHF0dTU1NjQwNjAtIA32QmWg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>report</recordtype></control><display><type>report</type><title>Root Cause Analysis for the ATIRCM/CMWS Program</title><source>DTIC Technical Reports</source><creator>Balaban, Harold S ; Kodzwa, Paul M ; Rehwinkel, Andrew S ; Davis, Gregory A ; Bronson, Patricia F</creator><creatorcontrib>Balaban, Harold S ; Kodzwa, Paul M ; Rehwinkel, Andrew S ; Davis, Gregory A ; Bronson, Patricia F ; INSTITUTE FOR DEFENSE ANALYSES ALEXANDRIA VA</creatorcontrib><description>We studied the Advanced Threat Infrared Countermeasure &amp; Common Missile Warning System (ATIRCM/CMWS) program to understand the root cause of its recent critical Nunn-McCurdy Breach. We discovered two causes. First, neither system was technically mature enough when the program was granted Milestone II authority in 1996 and this has caused numerous technical problems resulting in large cost growth in non-recurring engineering. The inaccurate technological maturity assessments led to unrealistic baseline estimates for both cost and schedule. Second, the combined weight of the two systems is far in excess of that specified in the operational requirements document from Milestone II and no major effort was made to reduce it. Because of the weight, the system could not be used as a fleet-wide solution, as envisioned at Milestone II. Consequently, a quantity reduction was inevitable, leading to growth in unit cost. We also found that this program has used methods for quantity accounting that may have become inconsistent with statute. While quantity accounting has not caused cost growth, it has somewhat obscured it.</description><language>eng</language><subject>ATIRCM(ADVANCED THREAT INFRARED COUNTERMEASURE) ; CMWS(COMMON MISSILE WARNING SYSTEM) ; COST ESTIMATES ; COST GROWTH ; ENGINEERING ; GUIDED MISSILES ; INFRARED COUNTERMEASURES ; NUNN-MCCURDY BREACH ; Optical Countermeasures ; ROOT CAUSE ANALYSIS ; SCHEDULING ; THREATS ; WARNING SYSTEMS</subject><creationdate>2010</creationdate><rights>Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,776,881,27544,27545</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://apps.dtic.mil/sti/citations/ADA555310$$EView_record_in_DTIC$$FView_record_in_$$GDTIC$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Balaban, Harold S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kodzwa, Paul M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rehwinkel, Andrew S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davis, Gregory A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bronson, Patricia F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>INSTITUTE FOR DEFENSE ANALYSES ALEXANDRIA VA</creatorcontrib><title>Root Cause Analysis for the ATIRCM/CMWS Program</title><description>We studied the Advanced Threat Infrared Countermeasure &amp; Common Missile Warning System (ATIRCM/CMWS) program to understand the root cause of its recent critical Nunn-McCurdy Breach. We discovered two causes. First, neither system was technically mature enough when the program was granted Milestone II authority in 1996 and this has caused numerous technical problems resulting in large cost growth in non-recurring engineering. The inaccurate technological maturity assessments led to unrealistic baseline estimates for both cost and schedule. Second, the combined weight of the two systems is far in excess of that specified in the operational requirements document from Milestone II and no major effort was made to reduce it. Because of the weight, the system could not be used as a fleet-wide solution, as envisioned at Milestone II. Consequently, a quantity reduction was inevitable, leading to growth in unit cost. We also found that this program has used methods for quantity accounting that may have become inconsistent with statute. While quantity accounting has not caused cost growth, it has somewhat obscured it.</description><subject>ATIRCM(ADVANCED THREAT INFRARED COUNTERMEASURE)</subject><subject>CMWS(COMMON MISSILE WARNING SYSTEM)</subject><subject>COST ESTIMATES</subject><subject>COST GROWTH</subject><subject>ENGINEERING</subject><subject>GUIDED MISSILES</subject><subject>INFRARED COUNTERMEASURES</subject><subject>NUNN-MCCURDY BREACH</subject><subject>Optical Countermeasures</subject><subject>ROOT CAUSE ANALYSIS</subject><subject>SCHEDULING</subject><subject>THREATS</subject><subject>WARNING SYSTEMS</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>report</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>report</recordtype><sourceid>1RU</sourceid><recordid>eNrjZNAPys8vUXBOLC1OVXDMS8ypLM4sVkjLL1IoyQAKhHgGOfvqO_uGBysEFOWnFyXm8jCwpiXmFKfyQmluBhk31xBnD92Ukszk-OKSzLzUknhHF0dTU1NjQwNjAtIA32QmWg</recordid><startdate>201006</startdate><enddate>201006</enddate><creator>Balaban, Harold S</creator><creator>Kodzwa, Paul M</creator><creator>Rehwinkel, Andrew S</creator><creator>Davis, Gregory A</creator><creator>Bronson, Patricia F</creator><scope>1RU</scope><scope>BHM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201006</creationdate><title>Root Cause Analysis for the ATIRCM/CMWS Program</title><author>Balaban, Harold S ; Kodzwa, Paul M ; Rehwinkel, Andrew S ; Davis, Gregory A ; Bronson, Patricia F</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-dtic_stinet_ADA5553103</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>reports</rsrctype><prefilter>reports</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>ATIRCM(ADVANCED THREAT INFRARED COUNTERMEASURE)</topic><topic>CMWS(COMMON MISSILE WARNING SYSTEM)</topic><topic>COST ESTIMATES</topic><topic>COST GROWTH</topic><topic>ENGINEERING</topic><topic>GUIDED MISSILES</topic><topic>INFRARED COUNTERMEASURES</topic><topic>NUNN-MCCURDY BREACH</topic><topic>Optical Countermeasures</topic><topic>ROOT CAUSE ANALYSIS</topic><topic>SCHEDULING</topic><topic>THREATS</topic><topic>WARNING SYSTEMS</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Balaban, Harold S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kodzwa, Paul M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rehwinkel, Andrew S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davis, Gregory A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bronson, Patricia F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>INSTITUTE FOR DEFENSE ANALYSES ALEXANDRIA VA</creatorcontrib><collection>DTIC Technical Reports</collection><collection>DTIC STINET</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Balaban, Harold S</au><au>Kodzwa, Paul M</au><au>Rehwinkel, Andrew S</au><au>Davis, Gregory A</au><au>Bronson, Patricia F</au><aucorp>INSTITUTE FOR DEFENSE ANALYSES ALEXANDRIA VA</aucorp><format>book</format><genre>unknown</genre><ristype>RPRT</ristype><btitle>Root Cause Analysis for the ATIRCM/CMWS Program</btitle><date>2010-06</date><risdate>2010</risdate><abstract>We studied the Advanced Threat Infrared Countermeasure &amp; Common Missile Warning System (ATIRCM/CMWS) program to understand the root cause of its recent critical Nunn-McCurdy Breach. We discovered two causes. First, neither system was technically mature enough when the program was granted Milestone II authority in 1996 and this has caused numerous technical problems resulting in large cost growth in non-recurring engineering. The inaccurate technological maturity assessments led to unrealistic baseline estimates for both cost and schedule. Second, the combined weight of the two systems is far in excess of that specified in the operational requirements document from Milestone II and no major effort was made to reduce it. Because of the weight, the system could not be used as a fleet-wide solution, as envisioned at Milestone II. Consequently, a quantity reduction was inevitable, leading to growth in unit cost. We also found that this program has used methods for quantity accounting that may have become inconsistent with statute. While quantity accounting has not caused cost growth, it has somewhat obscured it.</abstract><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier
ispartof
issn
language eng
recordid cdi_dtic_stinet_ADA555310
source DTIC Technical Reports
subjects ATIRCM(ADVANCED THREAT INFRARED COUNTERMEASURE)
CMWS(COMMON MISSILE WARNING SYSTEM)
COST ESTIMATES
COST GROWTH
ENGINEERING
GUIDED MISSILES
INFRARED COUNTERMEASURES
NUNN-MCCURDY BREACH
Optical Countermeasures
ROOT CAUSE ANALYSIS
SCHEDULING
THREATS
WARNING SYSTEMS
title Root Cause Analysis for the ATIRCM/CMWS Program
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T13%3A14%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-dtic_1RU&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=unknown&rft.btitle=Root%20Cause%20Analysis%20for%20the%20ATIRCM/CMWS%20Program&rft.au=Balaban,%20Harold%20S&rft.aucorp=INSTITUTE%20FOR%20DEFENSE%20ANALYSES%20ALEXANDRIA%20VA&rft.date=2010-06&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cdtic_1RU%3EADA555310%3C/dtic_1RU%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true