Due Process for Adverse Personnel Security Determinations in the Department of Defense
This study was undertaken to assess the advisability of establishing an independent board or boards for the appeal of adverse personnel security determinations in the Department of Defense. Current appeal procedures are described and assessed. Alternatives for more independent appeal procedures are...
Gespeichert in:
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Report |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | |
|---|---|
| container_issue | |
| container_start_page | |
| container_title | |
| container_volume | |
| creator | Riedel, James A Crawford, Kent S |
| description | This study was undertaken to assess the advisability of establishing an independent board or boards for the appeal of adverse personnel security determinations in the Department of Defense. Current appeal procedures are described and assessed. Alternatives for more independent appeal procedures are presented, including their advantages and disadvantages relative to current procedures. Adoption of component-level appeal boards to recommend to achieve more independent due process. The report also provides specific recommendations for improving the fairness of appeal procedures. |
| format | Report |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>dtic_1RU</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_dtic_stinet_ADA293820</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>ADA293820</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-dtic_stinet_ADA2938203</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFibEKwjAURbM4iPoHDu8HBGkXHUOjOAqKawnpDQbaF8l7Ffx7M7i73MM5d2kebgZdSw4QoZgL2eGNIrXVzcwY6YYwl6QfclCUKbHXlFkoMekTtb580QmslGO1CBaszSL6UbD5cWW259O9u-wGTaEXTQztrbPNsT00-_bP_QW3LTZm</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>report</recordtype></control><display><type>report</type><title>Due Process for Adverse Personnel Security Determinations in the Department of Defense</title><source>DTIC Technical Reports</source><creator>Riedel, James A ; Crawford, Kent S</creator><creatorcontrib>Riedel, James A ; Crawford, Kent S ; DEFENSE PERSONNEL SECURITY RESEARCH CENTER MONTEREY CA</creatorcontrib><description>This study was undertaken to assess the advisability of establishing an independent board or boards for the appeal of adverse personnel security determinations in the Department of Defense. Current appeal procedures are described and assessed. Alternatives for more independent appeal procedures are presented, including their advantages and disadvantages relative to current procedures. Adoption of component-level appeal boards to recommend to achieve more independent due process. The report also provides specific recommendations for improving the fairness of appeal procedures.</description><language>eng</language><subject>CLEARANCES ; COUNTERMEASURES ; DATA PROCESSING ; Defense Systems ; DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE ; NATIONAL SECURITY ; SECURITY ; SECURITY CLEARANCE ; SECURITY PERSONNEL</subject><creationdate>1993</creationdate><rights>APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,776,881,27546,27547</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://apps.dtic.mil/sti/citations/ADA293820$$EView_record_in_DTIC$$FView_record_in_$$GDTIC$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Riedel, James A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crawford, Kent S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DEFENSE PERSONNEL SECURITY RESEARCH CENTER MONTEREY CA</creatorcontrib><title>Due Process for Adverse Personnel Security Determinations in the Department of Defense</title><description>This study was undertaken to assess the advisability of establishing an independent board or boards for the appeal of adverse personnel security determinations in the Department of Defense. Current appeal procedures are described and assessed. Alternatives for more independent appeal procedures are presented, including their advantages and disadvantages relative to current procedures. Adoption of component-level appeal boards to recommend to achieve more independent due process. The report also provides specific recommendations for improving the fairness of appeal procedures.</description><subject>CLEARANCES</subject><subject>COUNTERMEASURES</subject><subject>DATA PROCESSING</subject><subject>Defense Systems</subject><subject>DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE</subject><subject>NATIONAL SECURITY</subject><subject>SECURITY</subject><subject>SECURITY CLEARANCE</subject><subject>SECURITY PERSONNEL</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>report</rsrctype><creationdate>1993</creationdate><recordtype>report</recordtype><sourceid>1RU</sourceid><recordid>eNqFibEKwjAURbM4iPoHDu8HBGkXHUOjOAqKawnpDQbaF8l7Ffx7M7i73MM5d2kebgZdSw4QoZgL2eGNIrXVzcwY6YYwl6QfclCUKbHXlFkoMekTtb580QmslGO1CBaszSL6UbD5cWW259O9u-wGTaEXTQztrbPNsT00-_bP_QW3LTZm</recordid><startdate>199309</startdate><enddate>199309</enddate><creator>Riedel, James A</creator><creator>Crawford, Kent S</creator><scope>1RU</scope><scope>BHM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199309</creationdate><title>Due Process for Adverse Personnel Security Determinations in the Department of Defense</title><author>Riedel, James A ; Crawford, Kent S</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-dtic_stinet_ADA2938203</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>reports</rsrctype><prefilter>reports</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1993</creationdate><topic>CLEARANCES</topic><topic>COUNTERMEASURES</topic><topic>DATA PROCESSING</topic><topic>Defense Systems</topic><topic>DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE</topic><topic>NATIONAL SECURITY</topic><topic>SECURITY</topic><topic>SECURITY CLEARANCE</topic><topic>SECURITY PERSONNEL</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Riedel, James A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crawford, Kent S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DEFENSE PERSONNEL SECURITY RESEARCH CENTER MONTEREY CA</creatorcontrib><collection>DTIC Technical Reports</collection><collection>DTIC STINET</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Riedel, James A</au><au>Crawford, Kent S</au><aucorp>DEFENSE PERSONNEL SECURITY RESEARCH CENTER MONTEREY CA</aucorp><format>book</format><genre>unknown</genre><ristype>RPRT</ristype><btitle>Due Process for Adverse Personnel Security Determinations in the Department of Defense</btitle><date>1993-09</date><risdate>1993</risdate><abstract>This study was undertaken to assess the advisability of establishing an independent board or boards for the appeal of adverse personnel security determinations in the Department of Defense. Current appeal procedures are described and assessed. Alternatives for more independent appeal procedures are presented, including their advantages and disadvantages relative to current procedures. Adoption of component-level appeal boards to recommend to achieve more independent due process. The report also provides specific recommendations for improving the fairness of appeal procedures.</abstract><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| identifier | |
| ispartof | |
| issn | |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_dtic_stinet_ADA293820 |
| source | DTIC Technical Reports |
| subjects | CLEARANCES COUNTERMEASURES DATA PROCESSING Defense Systems DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE NATIONAL SECURITY SECURITY SECURITY CLEARANCE SECURITY PERSONNEL |
| title | Due Process for Adverse Personnel Security Determinations in the Department of Defense |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T16%3A12%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-dtic_1RU&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=unknown&rft.btitle=Due%20Process%20for%20Adverse%20Personnel%20Security%20Determinations%20in%20the%20Department%20of%20Defense&rft.au=Riedel,%20James%20A&rft.aucorp=DEFENSE%20PERSONNEL%20SECURITY%20RESEARCH%20CENTER%20MONTEREY%20CA&rft.date=1993-09&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cdtic_1RU%3EADA293820%3C/dtic_1RU%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |