Executive Summary: Navy Civilian Executive Study

The results of the study were analyzed to determine if there were significant differences among various subpopulations of executives (e.g., R&D vs. non R&D, staff vs. line, field vs. headquarters). In general, a high degree of commonality was found across subpopulations. The most common differences found were between executives in laboratories and executives in headquarters. Information generated by this study can be used in making decisions about the use and development of Navy civilian executives. Moreover, it has implications for management and executive development throughout the shore establishment. The detailed study findings can serve as input to the development of executive training programs. For purposes of this executive summary, the conclusions and recommendations focus on broad policy considerations. The implications for executive development are as follows: Although relatively few executives have had extensive academic training in management, leadership, or administration, they spend most of their time performing tasks in these areas. This highlights a major training need. It includes not only general management knowledge and skills (e.g., decision-making, communication) but also specific knowledge and skills relevant to functioning in the Navy shore establishment (e.g., civil service rules, PPBS).