2016 Workplace and Gender Relations Survey of Active Duty Members: Statistical Methodology Report
The 2016 Workplace and Gender Relations Survey of Active Duty Members (2016 WGRA), a key source of information for evaluating the programs pertaining to unwanted gender-related issues in the military and for assessing the gender relations environment across the Services. This report describes the st...
Gespeichert in:
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Report |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | |
|---|---|
| container_issue | |
| container_start_page | |
| container_title | |
| container_volume | |
| creator | Nichols,Camille Galbreath,Nathan Raguindin,Shirley Gallus,Jessica Garst,Paul Rosen,Paul Lahm,Kimberly Cohen,Melissa Zabecki,Jessica Thompson,James Richards,Aileen |
| description | The 2016 Workplace and Gender Relations Survey of Active Duty Members (2016 WGRA), a key source of information for evaluating the programs pertaining to unwanted gender-related issues in the military and for assessing the gender relations environment across the Services. This report describes the statistical methodologies for the 2016 WGRA. The first section describes the sample design and selection of the sample. The second section describes weighting and variance estimation, as well as a comparison to the 2014 RAND Military Workplace Study (2014 RMWS) and 2015 Workplace and Gender Relations Survey of Reserve Component Members (2015 WGRR). The third section describes the statistical tests used for the 2016 WGRA. The fourth section describes the calculation of cooperation, completion, and response rates for the full sample and population subgroups. The fifth section provides an overview of the nonresponse bias analysis that will be done at a later date. |
| format | Report |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>dtic_1RU</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_dtic_stinet_AD1032761</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>AD1032761</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-dtic_stinet_AD10327613</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNrjZEg0MjA0UwjPL8ouyElMTlVIzEtRcE_NS0ktUghKzUksyczPK1YILi0qS61UyE9TcEwuySxLVXApLalU8E3NTUotKrZSCC4BqisuyUxOzAEKlmTkp-Tn5KdXAg0oyC8q4WFgTUvMKU7lhdLcDDJuriHOHropQB3xQG15qSXxji6GBsZG5maGxgSkAcakOWo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>report</recordtype></control><display><type>report</type><title>2016 Workplace and Gender Relations Survey of Active Duty Members: Statistical Methodology Report</title><source>DTIC Technical Reports</source><creator>Nichols,Camille ; Galbreath,Nathan ; Raguindin,Shirley ; Gallus,Jessica ; Garst,Paul ; Rosen,Paul ; Lahm,Kimberly ; Cohen,Melissa ; Zabecki,Jessica ; Thompson,James ; Richards,Aileen</creator><creatorcontrib>Nichols,Camille ; Galbreath,Nathan ; Raguindin,Shirley ; Gallus,Jessica ; Garst,Paul ; Rosen,Paul ; Lahm,Kimberly ; Cohen,Melissa ; Zabecki,Jessica ; Thompson,James ; Richards,Aileen ; Office of People Analytics Alexandria United States</creatorcontrib><description>The 2016 Workplace and Gender Relations Survey of Active Duty Members (2016 WGRA), a key source of information for evaluating the programs pertaining to unwanted gender-related issues in the military and for assessing the gender relations environment across the Services. This report describes the statistical methodologies for the 2016 WGRA. The first section describes the sample design and selection of the sample. The second section describes weighting and variance estimation, as well as a comparison to the 2014 RAND Military Workplace Study (2014 RMWS) and 2015 Workplace and Gender Relations Survey of Reserve Component Members (2015 WGRR). The third section describes the statistical tests used for the 2016 WGRA. The fourth section describes the calculation of cooperation, completion, and response rates for the full sample and population subgroups. The fifth section provides an overview of the nonresponse bias analysis that will be done at a later date.</description><language>eng</language><subject>Analytical weights ; bias ; Case Dispositions ; data processing ; department of defense ; dod (department of defense) ; DoD Sexual Assault and Equal Opportunity Programs and Policies ; gender discrimination ; meo (Military Equal Opportunity) ; MEO Violations ; military personnel ; Military Workplace Climate ; minority groups ; policies ; Reporting ; Sample Allocation ; sampling ; sexual assault ; sexual harassment ; statistics ; Statistics and Probability ; Survey Methodology ; surveys ; Test Facilities, Equipment and Methods ; Training ; variables</subject><creationdate>2017</creationdate><rights>Approved For Public Release</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,780,885,27558,27559</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://apps.dtic.mil/sti/citations/AD1032761$$EView_record_in_DTIC$$FView_record_in_$$GDTIC$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nichols,Camille</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Galbreath,Nathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raguindin,Shirley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gallus,Jessica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garst,Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosen,Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lahm,Kimberly</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cohen,Melissa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zabecki,Jessica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thompson,James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Richards,Aileen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Office of People Analytics Alexandria United States</creatorcontrib><title>2016 Workplace and Gender Relations Survey of Active Duty Members: Statistical Methodology Report</title><description>The 2016 Workplace and Gender Relations Survey of Active Duty Members (2016 WGRA), a key source of information for evaluating the programs pertaining to unwanted gender-related issues in the military and for assessing the gender relations environment across the Services. This report describes the statistical methodologies for the 2016 WGRA. The first section describes the sample design and selection of the sample. The second section describes weighting and variance estimation, as well as a comparison to the 2014 RAND Military Workplace Study (2014 RMWS) and 2015 Workplace and Gender Relations Survey of Reserve Component Members (2015 WGRR). The third section describes the statistical tests used for the 2016 WGRA. The fourth section describes the calculation of cooperation, completion, and response rates for the full sample and population subgroups. The fifth section provides an overview of the nonresponse bias analysis that will be done at a later date.</description><subject>Analytical weights</subject><subject>bias</subject><subject>Case Dispositions</subject><subject>data processing</subject><subject>department of defense</subject><subject>dod (department of defense)</subject><subject>DoD Sexual Assault and Equal Opportunity Programs and Policies</subject><subject>gender discrimination</subject><subject>meo (Military Equal Opportunity)</subject><subject>MEO Violations</subject><subject>military personnel</subject><subject>Military Workplace Climate</subject><subject>minority groups</subject><subject>policies</subject><subject>Reporting</subject><subject>Sample Allocation</subject><subject>sampling</subject><subject>sexual assault</subject><subject>sexual harassment</subject><subject>statistics</subject><subject>Statistics and Probability</subject><subject>Survey Methodology</subject><subject>surveys</subject><subject>Test Facilities, Equipment and Methods</subject><subject>Training</subject><subject>variables</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>report</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>report</recordtype><sourceid>1RU</sourceid><recordid>eNrjZEg0MjA0UwjPL8ouyElMTlVIzEtRcE_NS0ktUghKzUksyczPK1YILi0qS61UyE9TcEwuySxLVXApLalU8E3NTUotKrZSCC4BqisuyUxOzAEKlmTkp-Tn5KdXAg0oyC8q4WFgTUvMKU7lhdLcDDJuriHOHropQB3xQG15qSXxji6GBsZG5maGxgSkAcakOWo</recordid><startdate>20170301</startdate><enddate>20170301</enddate><creator>Nichols,Camille</creator><creator>Galbreath,Nathan</creator><creator>Raguindin,Shirley</creator><creator>Gallus,Jessica</creator><creator>Garst,Paul</creator><creator>Rosen,Paul</creator><creator>Lahm,Kimberly</creator><creator>Cohen,Melissa</creator><creator>Zabecki,Jessica</creator><creator>Thompson,James</creator><creator>Richards,Aileen</creator><scope>1RU</scope><scope>BHM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170301</creationdate><title>2016 Workplace and Gender Relations Survey of Active Duty Members: Statistical Methodology Report</title><author>Nichols,Camille ; Galbreath,Nathan ; Raguindin,Shirley ; Gallus,Jessica ; Garst,Paul ; Rosen,Paul ; Lahm,Kimberly ; Cohen,Melissa ; Zabecki,Jessica ; Thompson,James ; Richards,Aileen</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-dtic_stinet_AD10327613</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>reports</rsrctype><prefilter>reports</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Analytical weights</topic><topic>bias</topic><topic>Case Dispositions</topic><topic>data processing</topic><topic>department of defense</topic><topic>dod (department of defense)</topic><topic>DoD Sexual Assault and Equal Opportunity Programs and Policies</topic><topic>gender discrimination</topic><topic>meo (Military Equal Opportunity)</topic><topic>MEO Violations</topic><topic>military personnel</topic><topic>Military Workplace Climate</topic><topic>minority groups</topic><topic>policies</topic><topic>Reporting</topic><topic>Sample Allocation</topic><topic>sampling</topic><topic>sexual assault</topic><topic>sexual harassment</topic><topic>statistics</topic><topic>Statistics and Probability</topic><topic>Survey Methodology</topic><topic>surveys</topic><topic>Test Facilities, Equipment and Methods</topic><topic>Training</topic><topic>variables</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nichols,Camille</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Galbreath,Nathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raguindin,Shirley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gallus,Jessica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garst,Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosen,Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lahm,Kimberly</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cohen,Melissa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zabecki,Jessica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thompson,James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Richards,Aileen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Office of People Analytics Alexandria United States</creatorcontrib><collection>DTIC Technical Reports</collection><collection>DTIC STINET</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nichols,Camille</au><au>Galbreath,Nathan</au><au>Raguindin,Shirley</au><au>Gallus,Jessica</au><au>Garst,Paul</au><au>Rosen,Paul</au><au>Lahm,Kimberly</au><au>Cohen,Melissa</au><au>Zabecki,Jessica</au><au>Thompson,James</au><au>Richards,Aileen</au><aucorp>Office of People Analytics Alexandria United States</aucorp><format>book</format><genre>unknown</genre><ristype>RPRT</ristype><btitle>2016 Workplace and Gender Relations Survey of Active Duty Members: Statistical Methodology Report</btitle><date>2017-03-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><abstract>The 2016 Workplace and Gender Relations Survey of Active Duty Members (2016 WGRA), a key source of information for evaluating the programs pertaining to unwanted gender-related issues in the military and for assessing the gender relations environment across the Services. This report describes the statistical methodologies for the 2016 WGRA. The first section describes the sample design and selection of the sample. The second section describes weighting and variance estimation, as well as a comparison to the 2014 RAND Military Workplace Study (2014 RMWS) and 2015 Workplace and Gender Relations Survey of Reserve Component Members (2015 WGRR). The third section describes the statistical tests used for the 2016 WGRA. The fourth section describes the calculation of cooperation, completion, and response rates for the full sample and population subgroups. The fifth section provides an overview of the nonresponse bias analysis that will be done at a later date.</abstract><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| identifier | |
| ispartof | |
| issn | |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_dtic_stinet_AD1032761 |
| source | DTIC Technical Reports |
| subjects | Analytical weights bias Case Dispositions data processing department of defense dod (department of defense) DoD Sexual Assault and Equal Opportunity Programs and Policies gender discrimination meo (Military Equal Opportunity) MEO Violations military personnel Military Workplace Climate minority groups policies Reporting Sample Allocation sampling sexual assault sexual harassment statistics Statistics and Probability Survey Methodology surveys Test Facilities, Equipment and Methods Training variables |
| title | 2016 Workplace and Gender Relations Survey of Active Duty Members: Statistical Methodology Report |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T04%3A13%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-dtic_1RU&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=unknown&rft.btitle=2016%20Workplace%20and%20Gender%20Relations%20Survey%20of%20Active%20Duty%20Members:%20Statistical%20Methodology%20Report&rft.au=Nichols,Camille&rft.aucorp=Office%20of%20People%20Analytics%20Alexandria%20United%20States&rft.date=2017-03-01&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cdtic_1RU%3EAD1032761%3C/dtic_1RU%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |