STRATEGY IN INTRA-TRIAD AND INTER-TRIAD INTERACTION
Inter-group negotiation was compared with intra-group negotiation in three different games. Each session brought together three triads, homogeneous in sex. The Test of Strategy was used to compose a group high in accommodative tendencies, one low in this respect (i.e., high in exploitative tendencie...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Report |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Inter-group negotiation was compared with intra-group negotiation in three different games. Each session brought together three triads, homogeneous in sex. The Test of Strategy was used to compose a group high in accommodative tendencies, one low in this respect (i.e., high in exploitative tendencies), and one intermediate in accommodativeness. Each group engaged, first, in intra-group play, then in inter-group play. The games were the Board Game, decision-making in Accommodation Problems, and the Politics Game. Weights were used to vary power pattern in the first and third of these; power differences were incorporated into simulated relationships in the second. The Board Game was played in the standard manner; in the Accommodation Problems, three sets of instructions oriented Ss to discussion, to obtaining the most possible, and to arriving at the fairest outcome; in the Politics Game, the inter-group situation involved a meeting of representatives. Pre- and post-game questionnaires elicited ratings of enjoyment, liking for other players, and desire to win. Analysis of the results are given.
See also TR-11, AD-638 008. |
---|