Toward multiscale simulations for solidification microstructure and microsegregation for selective laser melting of nickel-based superalloys
In this study, we carried out multiscale simulations that integrate a macro-scale finite element method simulation for mass and heat transfer of the transient molten pool and a micro-scale quantitative phase-field model for dendritic growth and solute distribution based on selective laser melting (S...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of materials research and technology 2023-07, Vol.25, p.3574-3587 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | In this study, we carried out multiscale simulations that integrate a macro-scale finite element method simulation for mass and heat transfer of the transient molten pool and a micro-scale quantitative phase-field model for dendritic growth and solute distribution based on selective laser melting (SLM) experiments. Macroscopic simulations reveal an approximately inverse coupling of solidification velocity Vs and thermal gradient G near the solid–liquid interface at the tail end of the molten pool. It was found that the maximum flow velocity of the Inconel 718 alloy melt in the molten pool exceeds 2×10−2 m/s and the maximum negative pressure reaches −5.28×10−4 Pa. Through quantitative phase-field simulations, the map about G/Vs for each solidification morphology was obtained, and it was found that solidification velocity dependent solute partition coefficients k(Vs) can strongly influence the estimated stability regions. The power law relationship of the primary dendritic arm spacing (PDAS) λ1 versus solidification velocity λ1∝Vsα agrees with the previous experimental results for lower G, and the exponent α decreases with increasing G. The PDAS λ1 versus cooling rate R following λ1∝R−0.512 is consistent with previous investigations. We found that λ1 is a nonlinear function with G−0.5Vs−0.25, i.e., λ1∝(G−0.5Vs−0.25)α, with α ranging from 0.887 to 2.466 for various G. Comparison of the predicted λ1 with Trivedi's model reveals that λ1 is still nonlinear with G−0.25Vs−0.25. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2238-7854 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.jmrt.2023.06.133 |