Erratum to: Does the use of supraglottic device in rabbits cause less injury than other airway management devices?
Unfortunately the original version of the article was missing the following statement. This Knowledge Summary has reviewed the available evidence on the use of a SGAD (v-gel®) in rabbit anaesthesia. Since writing a new design of a single use supraglottic airway device (SGAD) has been introduced; cur...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Veterinary evidence 2023-05, Vol.8 (2) |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Unfortunately the original version of the article was missing the following statement.
This Knowledge Summary has reviewed the available evidence on the use of a SGAD (v-gel®) in rabbit anaesthesia. Since writing a new design of a single use supraglottic airway device (SGAD) has been introduced; currently there is no published evidence on whether this new device has an impact on the risk of injury.
This error was in both the HTML and PDF versions. This has now been updated in both the HTML and PDF versions, and can be found in the clinical bottom line and the evidence section. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2396-9776 2396-9776 |
DOI: | 10.18849/ve.v8i2.663 |