Huggable Communication Medium Maintains Level of Trust during Conversation Game

There have been several attempts in recent years to develop a remote communication device using sensory modalities other than speech that would induce a user's positive experience with his/her conversation partner. Specifically, is a human-shaped pillow as well as a remote communication device...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Frontiers in psychology 2017-10, Vol.8, p.1862-1862
Hauptverfasser: Takahashi, Hideyuki, Ban, Midori, Osawa, Hirotaka, Nakanishi, Junya, Sumioka, Hidenobu, Ishiguro, Hiroshi
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:There have been several attempts in recent years to develop a remote communication device using sensory modalities other than speech that would induce a user's positive experience with his/her conversation partner. Specifically, is a human-shaped pillow as well as a remote communication device enabling users to combine a hugging experience with telecommunication to improve the quality of remote communication. The present research is based on the hypothesis that using maintains users' level of trust toward their conversation partners in situations prone to suspicion. The level of trust felt toward other remote game players was compared between participants using and those using a basic communication device while playing a modified version of , a conversation-based game, designed to evaluate trust. Although there are always winners and losers in the regular version of , the rules were modified to generate a possible scenario in which no enemy was present among the players and all players would win if they trusted each other. We examined the effect of using while playing on players' level of trust toward each other and our results demonstrated that in those using , the level of trust toward other players was maintained.
ISSN:1664-1078
1664-1078
DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01862