Treatment and referral patterns of patients with atopic dermatitis from the Danish primary care system to the tertiary care system

Background Patients with atopic dermatitis (AD) are mostly managed by general practitioners (GPs) and practicing dermatologists (PDs) in Denmark. In cases of severe and refractory AD, the primary physician can refer the patient to a specialised dermatology department. Objectives Aim of the study was...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:JEADV clinical practice 2024-09, Vol.3 (4), p.1005-1015
Hauptverfasser: Danielsen, Anna Kathrine, Frølunde, Anne Sofie, Heilskov, Sofine, Deleuran, Mette, Laust Thomsen, Janus, Vestergaard, Christian
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background Patients with atopic dermatitis (AD) are mostly managed by general practitioners (GPs) and practicing dermatologists (PDs) in Denmark. In cases of severe and refractory AD, the primary physician can refer the patient to a specialised dermatology department. Objectives Aim of the study was to investigate treatment at the time of referral to a specialised dermatology department and the cause stated by the GP in a Danish cohort of AD patients referred to the Department of Dermatology, Aarhus University Hospital from 2019 to 2021. Methods One hundred and thirty cases were randomly selected via diagnosis codes for AD. Information regarding the cause for referral and treatment given at time of referral was obtained from medical records. 18 cases were excluded due to missing referral in the patients' medical records, other diagnosis than AD or treatment initiation before 2019. The final cohort consisted of 112 cases. Differences between patients referred from GP and PD were analysed with Fisher's exact test. Results Most cases were referred by PDs (45.5%) and GPs (24.1%). GPs primarily referred due to acute flare‐ups in need of treatment (40.7%), and PDs due to lacking disease control (64.7%), (p‐values 
ISSN:2768-6566
2768-6566
DOI:10.1002/jvc2.374