Diagnostic value of serum human epididymal secretory protein 4 for endometrial cancer: a systematic review and meta analysis

Objective The diagnostic value of serum human epididymal secretory protein 4 (HE4) for endometrial cancer (EC) was assessed via evidence-based medicine (EBM) and systematic review (SR) methodologies. Methods The Cochrane Library, PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, CBM, CNKI, and Wan Fang databases were...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Discover. Oncology 2024-09, Vol.15 (1), p.498-11, Article 498
Hauptverfasser: Yuan, Jie, Xu, Chen, Liu, Chunyong, Yan, Ruiling
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objective The diagnostic value of serum human epididymal secretory protein 4 (HE4) for endometrial cancer (EC) was assessed via evidence-based medicine (EBM) and systematic review (SR) methodologies. Methods The Cochrane Library, PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, CBM, CNKI, and Wan Fang databases were searched up to April 1st, 2024, to identify relevant literature. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 (QUADAS-2) tool was utilized to evaluate the quality of the selected studies. The meta-analysis was conducted via RevMan 5.3, STATA 16.1, and Meta-disc software. Results A total of 22 studies comprising 9036 cases (3776 cases in the case group and 5260 cases in the control group) were included. The results revealed that HE4 exhibited a pooled sensitivity of 0.59 [95% CI (0.53, 0.64)], specificity of 0.93 [95% CI (0.88, 0.96)], positive likelihood ratio (PLR) of 6.87 [95% CI (4.57, 10.33)], negative likelihood ratio (NLR) of 0.46 [95% CI (0.39, 0.54)], diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) of 14.36 [95% CI (9.37, 21.17)], and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.78 [95% CI (0.75, 0.82)]. Conclusions Serum HE4 demonstrates high specificity and moderate sensitivity for diagnosing EC, thus serving as a valuable biomarker for clinicians either alone or in conjunction with other tumour markers.
ISSN:2730-6011
2730-6011
DOI:10.1007/s12672-024-01234-3