Power source–power grid coordinated typhoon defense strategy based on multiagent dynamic game theory

A power source–power grid coordinated typhoon defense strategy is proposed in this study to minimize the cost of power grid anti-typhoon reinforcement measures and improve defense efficiency. It is based on multiagent dynamic game theory. This strategy regards a typhoon as a rational gamer that alwa...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Global Energy Interconnection 2021-06, Vol.4 (3), p.285-294
Hauptverfasser: Su, Kai, Jiang, Liping, Liu, Jizhen
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:A power source–power grid coordinated typhoon defense strategy is proposed in this study to minimize the cost of power grid anti-typhoon reinforcement measures and improve defense efficiency. It is based on multiagent dynamic game theory. This strategy regards a typhoon as a rational gamer that always causes the greatest damage. Together with the grid planner and black start unit (BSU) planner, it forms a multiagent defense–attack–defense dynamic game model naturally. The model is adopted to determine the optimal reinforcements for the transmission lines, black start power capacity, and location. Typhoon Hato, which struck a partial coastal area in Guangdong province in China in 2017, was adopted to formulate a step-by-step model of a typhoon attacking coastal area power systems. The results were substituted into the multiagent defense–attack–defense dynamic game model to obtain the optimal transmission line reinforcement positions, as well as optimal BSU capacity and geographic positions. An effective typhoon defense strategy and minimum load shedding were achieved, demonstrating the feasibility and correctness of the proposed strategy. The related theories and methods of this study have positive significance for the prevention of uncertain large-scale natural disasters.
ISSN:2096-5117
DOI:10.1016/j.gloei.2021.07.008