Multimodal Analgesia Approach in Acute Low Back Pain Management: A Phase III Study of a Novel Analgesic Combination of Etoricoxib/Tramadol
Introduction Pain and disability management are crucial for a speedy recovery. Combining analgesics with different mechanisms of action provides greater pain relief with lower doses, promoting efficient multimodal analgesia. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety between two fixed-dose combina...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Pain and Therapy 2024-12, Vol.13 (6), p.1511-1528 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Introduction
Pain and disability management are crucial for a speedy recovery. Combining analgesics with different mechanisms of action provides greater pain relief with lower doses, promoting efficient multimodal analgesia. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety between two fixed-dose combinations (FDC): etoricoxib/tramadol compared to paracetamol/tramadol for the management of acute low back pain (LBP) in a 7-day treatment.
Methods
We conducted a phase IIIb, prospective, randomized, and multicenter study in patients with acute LBP treated with etoricoxib 90 mg/tramadol 50 mg (one packet of granules diluted in 100 ml of water, once a day [QD], for 7 days) or paracetamol 975 mg/tramadol 112.5 mg (one tablet of 325 mg/37.5 mg, three times a day [TID], for 7 days) to assess the efficacy (in terms of pain and disability improvement) and safety.
Results
One hundred and twenty-four patients were randomized to receive either etoricoxib/tramadol QD (
n
= 61) or paracetamol/tramadol TID (
n
= 63). From the magnitude of change in pain evaluations, differences were observed between the treatment groups at 3 [
p
= 0.054, CI 95% − 0.648 (− 0.010 to 1.306)] and 5 days (
p
= 0.041). The proportion of patients with a 30% reduction in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score was statistically significant when comparing the treatment groups on the third day of follow-up [
p
= 0.008, CI 95% 0.241 (0.061–0.421)]. An improvement in LBP’s disability to perform activities of daily routine (Oswestry and Roland–Morris questionnaires) was observed in both treatment groups. A total of 79 adverse events (AEs) (38 [48.1%] with etoricoxib/tramadol and 41 [51.9%] with paracetamol/tramadol) were reported. The most frequent AEs were nausea (17.7%) and dizziness (16.4%).
Conclusions
The results show the clinical benefits of etoricoxib/tramadol FDC, such as the sparing effect of tramadol dose per day, early therapeutic response rate compared with paracetamol/tramadol; which translates into faster pain relief, better adherence, less tramadol drug dependency, and a reduction of related AEs incidence.
Trial registration
ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT04968158. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2193-8237 2193-651X |
DOI: | 10.1007/s40122-024-00653-y |