Umbilical cord clamping in the early phases of the COVID-19 era – a systematic review and meta-analysis of reported practice and recommendations in guidelines

•Many neonates born to SARS-CoV-2+ mothers had their umbilical cords clamped early.•In contrast, most guidelines recommended delayed clamping of the umbilical cord.•Timing of cord clamping did not affect mother-to-neonate SARS-CoV-2 transmission. At the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, delayed um...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of infectious diseases 2023-12, Vol.137, p.63-70
Hauptverfasser: Berg, Johan Henrik Martin, Thies-Lagergren, Li, Svedenkrans, Jenny, Samkutty, Jeremiah, Larsson, Sara Marie, Mercer, Judith S., Rabe, Heike, Andersson, Ola, Zaigham, Mehreen
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•Many neonates born to SARS-CoV-2+ mothers had their umbilical cords clamped early.•In contrast, most guidelines recommended delayed clamping of the umbilical cord.•Timing of cord clamping did not affect mother-to-neonate SARS-CoV-2 transmission. At the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, delayed umbilical cord clamping (CC) at birth may have been commonly discouraged despite a lack of convincing evidence of mother-to-neonate SARS-CoV-2 transmission. We aimed to systematically review guidelines, and reports of practice and to analyze associations between timing of CC and mother-to-neonate SARS-CoV-2 transmission during the early phases of the pandemic. Major databases were searched from December 1, 2019, to July 20, 2021. Inclusion: studies and guidelines describing CC practice in women with SARS-CoV-2 infection during pregnancy until 2 postnatal days, giving birth to live-born neonates. Exclusion: no extractable data. Two reviewers independently screened studies for eligibility and assessed study quality. Pooled prevalence rates were calculated. Forty-eight studies (1476 neonates) and 40 guidelines were included. Delayed CC was recommended in 70.0% of the guidelines. Nevertheless, delayed CC was reported less often than early CC: 262/1476 (17.8%) vs 511/1476 (34.6%). Neonatal SARS-CoV-2 positivity rates were similar following delayed (1.2%) and early CC (1.3%). Most SARS-CoV-2 transmissions (93.3%) occurred in utero. Delayed CC did not seem to increase mother-to-neonate SARS-CoV-2 transmission. Due to its benefits, it should be encouraged even in births where the mother has a SARS-CoV-2 infection. Prospero CRD42020199500. [Display omitted]
ISSN:1201-9712
1878-3511
1878-3511
DOI:10.1016/j.ijid.2023.10.010