A shortened uncemented stem offers comparable positioning and increased metaphyseal fill compared to a standard uncemented stem
Background Shortened stems are increasingly used in uncemented total hip arthroplasty (THA) as they represent a compromise between the metaphyseal anchorage of short stems and the facilitated axial alignment of standard stems. The purpose of this study was to compare the metaphyseal canal-fill ratio...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics 2019-06, Vol.6 (1), p.28-7, Article 28 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background
Shortened stems are increasingly used in uncemented total hip arthroplasty (THA) as they represent a compromise between the metaphyseal anchorage of short stems and the facilitated axial alignment of standard stems. The purpose of this study was to compare the metaphyseal canal-fill ratio (CFR) and axial alignment of a shortened double-tapered stem with those of a standard stem. The hypothesis was that the shortened stem would achieve greater metaphyseal fill and comparable axial alignment.
Methods
The authors reviewed routine follow-up anteroposterior radiographs taken 2 months after THA to evaluate metaphyseal fill and axial alignment of a shortened stem (
n
= 96) and a standard stem (
n
= 101). The CFR was calculated at the level of the tip and superior margin of the lesser trochanter. Stem alignment was defined as the angle between the stem axis and the proximal anatomic femoral axis. Stems were classified as being in varus or valgus alignment if they deviated by more than 3° from the anatomic axis of the femur.
Results
Hips implanted with shortened and standard stems had comparable demographics and axial alignment (1.1° ± 1.7° vs 0.8° ± 1.2°;
p
= 0.331). However, varus alignment was observed in 5% of shortened stems compared to only 1% of standard stems, though this difference was not significant (
p
= 0.111). The femoral CFR was greater using shortened stems than using standard stems, both at the level of the tip of the lesser trochanter (0.91 ± 0.05 vs 0.85 ± 0.08;
p
|
---|---|
ISSN: | 2197-1153 2197-1153 |
DOI: | 10.1186/s40634-019-0197-1 |