EL V.2 Model for Predicting Food Safety Risks at Taiwan Border Using the Voting-Based Ensemble Method

Border management serves as a crucial control checkpoint for governments to regulate the quality and safety of imported food. In 2020, the first-generation ensemble learning prediction model (EL V.1) was introduced to Taiwan's border food management. This model primarily assesses the risk of im...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Foods 2023-05, Vol.12 (11), p.2118
Hauptverfasser: Wu, Li-Ya, Liu, Fang-Ming, Weng, Sung-Shun, Lin, Wen-Chou
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Border management serves as a crucial control checkpoint for governments to regulate the quality and safety of imported food. In 2020, the first-generation ensemble learning prediction model (EL V.1) was introduced to Taiwan's border food management. This model primarily assesses the risk of imported food by combining five algorithms to determine whether quality sampling should be performed on imported food at the border. In this study, a second-generation ensemble learning prediction model (EL V.2) was developed based on seven algorithms to enhance the "detection rate of unqualified cases" and improve the robustness of the model. In this study, Elastic Net was used to select the characteristic risk factors. Two algorithms were used to construct the new model: The Bagging-Gradient Boosting Machine and Bagging-Elastic Net. In addition, F was used to flexibly control the sampling rate, improving the predictive performance and robustness of the model. The chi-square test was employed to compare the efficacy of "pre-launch (2019) random sampling inspection" and "post-launch (2020-2022) model prediction sampling inspection". For cases recommended for inspection by the ensemble learning model and subsequently inspected, the unqualified rates were 5.10%, 6.36%, and 4.39% in 2020, 2021, and 2022, respectively, which were significantly higher ( < 0.001) compared with the random sampling rate of 2.09% in 2019. The prediction indices established by the confusion matrix were used to further evaluate the prediction effects of EL V.1 and EL V.2, and the EL V.2 model exhibited superior predictive performance compared with EL V.1, and both models outperformed random sampling.
ISSN:2304-8158
2304-8158
DOI:10.3390/foods12112118