Analytical Equations for the Prediction of the Failure Mode of Reinforced Concrete Beam-Column Joints Based on Interpretable Machine Learning and SHAP Values

One of the most critical components of reinforced concrete structures are beam-column joint systems, which greatly affect the overall behavior of a structure during a major seismic event. According to modern design codes, if the system fails, it should fail due to the flexural yielding of the beam a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) Switzerland), 2024-12, Vol.24 (24), p.7955
Hauptverfasser: Karampinis, Ioannis, Karabini, Martha, Rousakis, Theodoros, Iliadis, Lazaros, Karabinis, Athanasios
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:One of the most critical components of reinforced concrete structures are beam-column joint systems, which greatly affect the overall behavior of a structure during a major seismic event. According to modern design codes, if the system fails, it should fail due to the flexural yielding of the beam and not due to the shear failure of the joint. Thus, a reliable tool is required for the prediction of the failure mode of the joints in a preexisting population of structures. In the present paper, a novel methodology for the derivation of analytical equations for this task is presented. The formulation is based on SHapley Additive exPlanations values, which are commonly employed as an explainability tool in machine learning. Instead, in the present paper, they were also utilized as a transformed target variable to which the analytical curves were fitted, which approximated the predictions of an underlying machine learning model. A dataset comprising 478 experimental results was utilized and the eXtreme Gradient Boosting algorithm was initially fitted. This achieved an overall accuracy of ≈84%. The derived analytical equations achieved an accuracy of ≈78%. The corresponding metrics of precision, recall, and the F1-score ranged from ≈76% to ≈80% and were close across the two modes, indicating an unbiased model.
ISSN:1424-8220
1424-8220
DOI:10.3390/s24247955