A phase III, multicenter, double-blind, randomized clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ceftolozane/tazobactam plus metronidazole versus meropenem in Chinese participants with complicated intra-abdominal infections
•Phase III study of ceftolozane/tazobactam (C/T) plus metronidazole for complicated intra-abdominal infection in China.•C/T plus metronidazole was noninferior to meropenem for clinical response.•Safety was comparable between C/T plus metronidazole and meropenem groups.•C/T plus metronidazole had eff...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of infectious diseases 2022-10, Vol.123, p.157-165 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | •Phase III study of ceftolozane/tazobactam (C/T) plus metronidazole for complicated intra-abdominal infection in China.•C/T plus metronidazole was noninferior to meropenem for clinical response.•Safety was comparable between C/T plus metronidazole and meropenem groups.•C/T plus metronidazole had efficacy against extended-spectrum β-lactamase-positive Enterobacterales.
This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ceftolozane/tazobactam (C/T) plus metronidazole versus meropenem plus placebo for the treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infection (cIAI) in Chinese adult participants.
In this phase III clinical trial (NCT03830333), Chinese adult participants with cIAI were randomized 1:1 to receive C/T plus metronidazole or meropenem plus placebo. The primary objective was to assess C/T plus metronidazole for noninferiority versus meropenem for clinical response rate at the test of cure (TOC; 28 ± 2 days after study start) visit in the clinically evaluable population. Secondary endpoints included clinical and microbiologic responses at the TOC and end-of-treatment (≤24 hours after last dose) visits and adverse event rates.
Clinical cure at the TOC visit in the clinically evaluable population was 95.2% and 93.1% for C/T plus metronidazole and meropenem, respectively (between-treatment difference: 2.1% [95% confidence interval: -4.7%, 8.8%]); thus, noninferiority was met. Clinical responses at the TOC and end-of-treatment visits and microbiologic responses at the TOC visit were consistent with the primary efficacy endpoint. Safety was comparable between study treatment groups.
In Chinese adult participants with cIAI, C/T plus metronidazole was noninferior to meropenem, with comparable safety. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1201-9712 1878-3511 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.ijid.2022.08.003 |