Dermal exposure assessment of formal e-waste dismantlers to flame retardants and plasticizers using passive sampling methodologies

[Display omitted] •Dermal contact exposure of e-waste dismantlers to FRs and PZs was confirmed.•Concentrations of OPEs in T-shirts were higher than in wristbands.•The dominant compounds in both matrices were EHDPP, DCP, TPHP and BDE-209.•Non-CR risk through dermal contact was found in only one of the analysed situations.•Dermal contact appears to be the main occupational exposure route to FRs and PZs for e-waste dismantlers. The recycling of e-waste can lead to the release of organic chemicals when materials containing additives are subjected to dismantling and grinding. In this context, the exposure of workers from a Catalonian e-waste facility to flame retardants and plasticizers (including organophosphate esters (OPEs), polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs), novel brominated flame retardants (NBFRs) and dechloranes) was assessed using T-shirts and wristbands as passive samplers. The study area includes an area exclusively dedicated to cathodic ray-tube (CRT) TVs dismantling, and a grinding area where the rest of e-waste is ground. All the families of compounds were detected in both T-shirts and wristbands, with the highest concentration levels corresponding to OPEs, followed by PBDEs, NBFRs, and dechloranes. The CRT area presented higher concentration levels than the grinding area. The compounds with higher concentrations in T-shirts were 2-ethylhexyl diphenyl phosphate (EHDPP), diphenyl cresyl phosphate (DCP) and triphenyl phosphate (TPHP), and the total concentration of all groups ranged between 293 and 8324 ng/dm2-h (hour). In the case of the wristbands, the most abundant compounds were DCP, TPHP, and BDE-209, with total concentrations between 188 and 2248 ng/dm2-h. The two sampling methods appear to be complementary, as T-shirts collect coarser particles, while wristbands also capture volatile compounds. Based on normalized surface and time concentrations, the estimated daily intake (EDI) through dermal contact was calculated and carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic risks (CR and non-CR) associated with this activity assessed. The results show median CR 29 and 16 times below the threshold in CRT and grinding areas respectively. The non-CR medians were 2 and 3 times below the threshold, although in the CRT area one exceptional value surpassed the threshold, suggesting that risk can exist for some workers in the facility.