An Optimized NGS Workflow Defines Genetically Based Prognostic Categories for Patients with Uveal Melanoma

Despite advances in uveal melanoma (UM) diagnosis and treatment, about 50% of patients develop distant metastases, thereby displaying poor overall survival. Molecular profiling has identified several genetic alterations that can stratify patients with UM into different risk categories. However, thes...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Biomolecules (Basel, Switzerland) Switzerland), 2025-01, Vol.15 (1), p.146
Hauptverfasser: Massimino, Michele, Tirrò, Elena, Stella, Stefania, Tomarchio, Cristina, Di Bella, Sebastiano, Vitale, Silvia Rita, Conti, Chiara, Puglisi, Marialuisa, Di Crescenzo, Rosa Maria, Varricchio, Silvia, Merolla, Francesco, Broggi, Giuseppe, Martorana, Federica, Turdo, Alice, Gaggianesi, Miriam, Manzella, Livia, Russo, Andrea, Stassi, Giorgio, Caltabiano, Rosario, Staibano, Stefania, Vigneri, Paolo
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Despite advances in uveal melanoma (UM) diagnosis and treatment, about 50% of patients develop distant metastases, thereby displaying poor overall survival. Molecular profiling has identified several genetic alterations that can stratify patients with UM into different risk categories. However, these genetic alterations are currently dispersed over multiple studies and several methodologies, emphasizing the need for a defined workflow that will allow standardized and reproducible molecular analyses. Following the findings published by "The Cancer Genome Atlas-UM" (TCGA-UM) study, we developed an NGS-based gene panel (called the UMpanel) that classifies mutation sets in four categories: initiating alterations ( , , and ), prognostic alterations ( , , and ), emergent biomarkers ( , , , , and ) and chromosomal abnormalities (imbalances in chromosomes 1, 3 and 8). Employing commercial gene panels, reference mutated DNAs and Sanger sequencing, we performed a comparative analysis and found that our methodological approach successfully predicted survival with great specificity and sensitivity compared to the TCGA-UM cohort that was used as a validation group. Our results demonstrate that a reproducible NGS-based workflow translates into a reliable tool for the clinical stratification of patients with UM.
ISSN:2218-273X
2218-273X
DOI:10.3390/biom15010146