Quantitative Structure-Retention Relationship Analysis of Polycyclic Aromatic Compounds in Ultra-High Performance Chromatography

A comparative quantitative structure-retention relationship (QSRR) study was carried out to predict the retention time of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) using molecular descriptors. The molecular descriptors were generated by the software Dragon and employed to build QSRR models. The effect...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) Switzerland), 2023-04, Vol.28 (7), p.3218
Hauptverfasser: Ruggieri, Fabrizio, Biancolillo, Alessandra, D'Archivio, Angelo Antonio, Di Donato, Francesca, Foschi, Martina, Maggi, Maria Anna, Quattrociocchi, Claudia
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:A comparative quantitative structure-retention relationship (QSRR) study was carried out to predict the retention time of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) using molecular descriptors. The molecular descriptors were generated by the software Dragon and employed to build QSRR models. The effect of chromatographic parameters, such as flow rate, temperature, and gradient time, was also considered. An artificial neural network (ANN) and Partial Least Squares Regression (PLS-R) were used to investigate the correlation between the retention time, taken as the response, and the predictors. Six descriptors were selected by the genetic algorithm for the development of the ANN model: the molecular weight (MW); ring descriptor types and ; radial distribution functions and and the 3D-MoRSE descriptor . The most significant descriptors in the PLS-R model were MW, , , , and ; edge adjacency indice ; 3D matrix-based descriptor ; and the GETAWAY descriptor . The built models were used to predict the retention of three analytes not included in the calibration set. Taking into account the statistical parameter RMSE for the prediction set (0.433 and 0.077 for the PLS-R and ANN models, respectively), the study confirmed that QSRR models, associated with chromatographic parameters, are better described by nonlinear methods.
ISSN:1420-3049
1420-3049
DOI:10.3390/molecules28073218