First‐generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy in 106 patients with compound EGFR‐mutated lung cancer: a single institution's clinical practice experience

Background The antitumour efficacy of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in lung cancer patients with compound epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations has not been resolved. Our study summarizes a single institutional experience of first‐generation TKI therapy for lung cancers with compound...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Cancer Communications 2018-07, Vol.38 (1), p.1-13
Hauptverfasser: Yu, Xiangyang, Zhang, Xuewen, Zhang, Zichen, Lin, Yongbin, Wen, Yingsheng, Chen, Yongqiang, Wang, Weidong, Zhang, Lanjun
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background The antitumour efficacy of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in lung cancer patients with compound epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations has not been resolved. Our study summarizes a single institutional experience of first‐generation TKI therapy for lung cancers with compound EGFR mutations. Methods A total of 106 consecutive patients with tumours bearing compound EGFR mutations were identified between January 2012 and May 2016; all patients received first‐generation TKI therapy. Deletions in exon 19 and the L858R point mutation in exon 21 were considered common mutations; T790M was considered separately because of its association with TKIs resistances. Any other mutation was defined as a rare mutation. Patients were divided as follows: double common mutations (group A); common plus T790M mutations (group B); common plus rare mutations (group C); double rare mutations (group D); and rare plus T790M mutations (group E). A separate group of 115 consecutive patients with a single common mutation was created for comparative analysis (group F). Results The frequency of patients with compound EGFR was 2.9% (114/3925) and their response rate to first‐generation TKIs was 50.9%, which was not significantly different from group F (67.0%, P = 0.088). The progression‐free survival (PFS) of the 106 patients receiving TKI therapy was worse than that of group F (median, 9.1 vs. 13.0 months, respectively; P < 0.001). The PFS of the compound mutation group was shorter than that of the single common mutation group (median, 10.1 months in group A, P = 0.240; 9.1 months in group B, P < 0.001; 9.6 months in group C, P = 0.010; 6.5 months in group D, P = 0.048; 5.4 months in group E, P = 0.017). Patients with a co‐occurring mutation in exon 20 (excluding T790M) exhibited significantly worse PFS than the patients with other compound mutations or with a single common mutation (median, 6.5 vs. 9.1 vs. 13.0 months, respectively, P = 0.002). Conclusions There was significant heterogeneity among the compound EGFR mutations and their response to first‐generation TKIs. Individualized treatment in clinical practice should be considered for each case.
ISSN:2523-3548
2523-3548
DOI:10.1186/s40880-018-0321-0